Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs FHKAX
ECCGX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs FHKAX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$16.53
Change-$0.11 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.74M
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$52.51
Change-$0.22 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
ECCGX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. FHKAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Hold and FHKAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. ECCGX (43.7M). ECCGX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: ECCGX (1.03) vs FHKAX (0.85). ECCGX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: ECCGX (32 years) vs FHKAX (18 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). ECCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCGX: FHKAX (0) vs ECCGX (1000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.37 vs. ECCGX (32.64). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : -1.22 vs. ECCGX (-39.07).
| ECCGX | FHKAX | ECCGX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 1.18 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 1.18 | 227% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.992 | 37.461 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.7M | 1.81B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.85 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.64 | 36.37 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.19 | 76.90 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -39.07 | -1.22 | 3,209% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.19 | 84.09 | -18% |