Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs FHKAX
ECCGX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs FHKAX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$14.65
Change-$0.09 (-0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.71M
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$42.55
Change-$0.03 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
ECCGX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. FHKAX commentary
Jun 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Buy and FHKAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.15B vs. ECCGX (38.7M). ECCGX (1.20) and FHKAX (1.16) have matching dividends . ECCGX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: ECCGX (32 years) vs FHKAX (17 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). ECCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCGX: FHKAX (0) vs ECCGX (1000). ECCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.90 vs. FHKAX (15.50). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.78 vs. ECCGX (-33.64).
| ECCGX | FHKAX | ECCGX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 1.18 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 1.18 | 227% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.264 | 10.923 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.7M | 1.15B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.16 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.90 | 15.50 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.99 | 27.74 | -58% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.64 | 1.78 | -1,893% |
| Returns for 10 years | -33.55 | 20.75 | -162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement