Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs FHKAX
ECCGX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs FHKAX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$14.94
Change+$0.12 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.76M
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$44.00
Change+$0.19 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
ECCGX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. FHKAX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Buy and FHKAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. ECCGX (39.8M). ECCGX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: ECCGX (1.16) vs FHKAX (1.07). ECCGX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: ECCGX (32 years) vs FHKAX (17 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). ECCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCGX: FHKAX (0) vs ECCGX (1000). ECCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.64 vs. FHKAX (16.27). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : -5.06 vs. ECCGX (-38.32).
| ECCGX | FHKAX | ECCGX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 1.18 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 1.18 | 227% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.884 | 14.208 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.8M | 1.24B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.07 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.64 | 16.27 | 158% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.82 | 33.50 | -47% |
| Returns for 5 years | -38.32 | -5.06 | 757% |
| Returns for 10 years | -30.60 | 35.56 | -86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement