Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs FHKCX
ECCGX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs FHKCX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$17.47
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.5M
Fidelity China Region
Price$56.86
Change+$0.59 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
ECCGX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. FHKCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Hold and FHKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. ECCGX (45.5M). ECCGX (0.99) and FHKCX (0.98) have matching dividends . ECCGX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: ECCGX (32 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). ECCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCGX: FHKCX (0) vs ECCGX (1000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.14 vs. ECCGX (26.56). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.82 vs. ECCGX (-30.29).
| ECCGX | FHKCX | ECCGX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 0.91 | 248% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 0.91 | 295% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.271 | 44.690 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.5M | 1.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.98 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.56 | 33.14 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.44 | 99.80 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.29 | 14.82 | -204% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.73 | 103.51 | -8% |