Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs FHKCX
ECCGX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs FHKCX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$16.06
Change+$0.15 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.09M
Fidelity China Region
Price$48.76
Change+$0.07 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
ECCGX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. FHKCX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Buy and FHKCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. ECCGX (41.1M). FHKCX (1.17) and ECCGX (1.13) have matching dividends . ECCGX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: ECCGX (32 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). ECCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCGX: FHKCX (0) vs ECCGX (1000). ECCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.16 vs. FHKCX (35.88). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 0.33 vs. ECCGX (-37.11).
| ECCGX | FHKCX | ECCGX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 0.91 | 248% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 0.91 | 295% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.333 | 25.199 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.1M | 1.31B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.17 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.16 | 35.88 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.81 | 51.10 | -13% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.11 | 0.33 | -11,302% |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.54 | 91.31 | -14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement