Ad is loading...
ECCGX vs FHKCX
ECCGX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs FHKCX
Eaton Vance Greater China Growth C
Price$12.86
Change-$0.34 (-2.58%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Fidelity China Region
Price$41.29
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
ECCGX vs. FHKCX commentary
Oct 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a StrongSell and FHKCX is a StrongSell.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. ECCGX (37.9M). FHKCX pays higher dividends than ECCGX: FHKCX (1.84) vs ECCGX (0.00). ECCGX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: ECCGX (31 years) vs FHKCX (29 years). ECCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FHKCX (24.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCGX: FHKCX (0) vs ECCGX (1000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.45 vs. ECCGX (-2.80). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 20.55 vs. ECCGX (-41.10).
| ECCGX | FHKCX | ECCGX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.544 | 29.053 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.9M | 1.2B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.84 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.80 | 31.45 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | -45.57 | -16.84 | 271% |
| Returns for 5 years | -41.10 | 20.55 | -200% |
| Returns for 10 years | -33.81 | 29.19 | -116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers