Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs FHKCX
ECCGX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs FHKCX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$14.94
Change+$0.12 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.76M
Fidelity China Region
Price$44.68
Change+$0.20 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
ECCGX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. FHKCX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Buy and FHKCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. ECCGX (39.8M). FHKCX pays higher dividends than ECCGX: FHKCX (1.22) vs ECCGX (1.16). ECCGX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: ECCGX (32 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). ECCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCGX: FHKCX (0) vs ECCGX (1000). ECCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.64 vs. FHKCX (16.59). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : -3.50 vs. ECCGX (-38.32).
| ECCGX | FHKCX | ECCGX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 0.91 | 248% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 0.91 | 295% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.884 | 14.374 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.8M | 1.24B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.22 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.64 | 16.59 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.82 | 34.67 | -46% |
| Returns for 5 years | -38.32 | -3.50 | 1,095% |
| Returns for 10 years | -30.60 | 38.05 | -80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement