Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs FHKCX
ECCGX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs FHKCX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$16.53
Change-$0.11 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.74M
Fidelity China Region
Price$53.37
Change-$0.21 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
ECCGX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. FHKCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Hold and FHKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. ECCGX (43.7M). ECCGX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: ECCGX (1.03) vs FHKCX (0.96). ECCGX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: ECCGX (32 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). ECCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCGX: FHKCX (0) vs ECCGX (1000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.70 vs. ECCGX (32.64). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 0.38 vs. ECCGX (-39.07).
| ECCGX | FHKCX | ECCGX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 0.91 | 248% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 0.91 | 295% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.992 | 37.773 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.7M | 1.81B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.96 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.64 | 36.70 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.19 | 78.42 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -39.07 | 0.38 | -10,324% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.19 | 87.39 | -17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement