Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs FHKCX
ECCGX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs FHKCX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$14.65
Change-$0.09 (-0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.71M
Fidelity China Region
Price$42.74
Change-$0.45 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
ECCGX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. FHKCX commentary
Jun 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Buy and FHKCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.15B vs. ECCGX (38.7M). FHKCX pays higher dividends than ECCGX: FHKCX (1.32) vs ECCGX (1.20). ECCGX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: ECCGX (32 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). ECCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCGX: FHKCX (0) vs ECCGX (1000). ECCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.11 vs. FHKCX (15.45). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.45 vs. ECCGX (-33.64).
| ECCGX | FHKCX | ECCGX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 0.91 | 248% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 0.91 | 295% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.264 | 11.057 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.7M | 1.15B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.32 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.11 | 15.45 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.38 | 25.77 | -71% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.64 | 3.45 | -975% |
| Returns for 10 years | -35.22 | 19.47 | -181% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement