Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs FHKIX
ECCGX vs FHKIX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs FHKIX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$16.53
Change-$0.11 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.74M
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$52.95
Change-$0.22 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
ECCGX vs FHKIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. FHKIX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Hold and FHKIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. ECCGX (43.7M). ECCGX (1.03) and FHKIX (1.00) have matching dividends . ECCGX was incepted earlier than FHKIX: ECCGX (32 years) vs FHKIX (18 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). ECCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCGX: FHKIX (0) vs ECCGX (1000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.75 vs. ECCGX (32.64). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 0.31 vs. ECCGX (-39.07).
| ECCGX | FHKIX | ECCGX / FHKIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 0.90 | 251% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 0.90 | 298% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.992 | 37.818 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.7M | 1.81B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.00 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.64 | 36.75 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.19 | 78.49 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -39.07 | 0.31 | -12,504% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.19 | 86.94 | -17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement