Ad is loading...
ECCGX vs FHKIX
ECCGX vs FHKIX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs FHKIX
Eaton Vance Greater China Growth C
Price$12.86
Change-$0.34 (-2.58%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$40.98
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs FHKIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
ECCGX vs. FHKIX commentary
Oct 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a StrongSell and FHKIX is a StrongSell.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. ECCGX (37.9M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than ECCGX: FHKIX (1.81) vs ECCGX (0.00). ECCGX was incepted earlier than FHKIX: ECCGX (31 years) vs FHKIX (16 years). ECCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FHKIX (24.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCGX: FHKIX (0) vs ECCGX (1000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.45 vs. ECCGX (-2.80). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 20.42 vs. ECCGX (-41.10).
| ECCGX | FHKIX | ECCGX / FHKIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.544 | 29.053 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.9M | 1.2B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.81 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.80 | 31.45 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | -45.57 | -16.88 | 270% |
| Returns for 5 years | -41.10 | 20.42 | -201% |
| Returns for 10 years | -33.81 | 28.78 | -117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers