Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs FHKIX
ECCGX vs FHKIX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs FHKIX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$14.65
Change-$0.09 (-0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.71M
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$42.40
Change-$0.45 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
ECCGX vs FHKIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. FHKIX commentary
Jun 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Buy and FHKIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.15B vs. ECCGX (38.7M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than ECCGX: FHKIX (1.37) vs ECCGX (1.20). ECCGX was incepted earlier than FHKIX: ECCGX (32 years) vs FHKIX (17 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). ECCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCGX: FHKIX (0) vs ECCGX (1000). ECCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.11 vs. FHKIX (15.48). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 3.35 vs. ECCGX (-33.64).
| ECCGX | FHKIX | ECCGX / FHKIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 0.90 | 251% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 0.90 | 298% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.264 | 11.068 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.7M | 1.15B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.37 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.11 | 15.48 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.38 | 25.81 | -71% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.64 | 3.35 | -1,004% |
| Returns for 10 years | -35.22 | 19.18 | -184% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers