Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs FHKTX
ECCGX vs FHKTX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs FHKTX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$14.65
Change-$0.09 (-0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.71M
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$41.72
Change-$0.44 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
ECCGX vs FHKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. FHKTX commentary
Jun 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Buy and FHKTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.15B vs. ECCGX (38.7M). ECCGX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: ECCGX (1.20) vs FHKTX (1.05). ECCGX was incepted earlier than FHKTX: ECCGX (32 years) vs FHKTX (17 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). ECCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCGX: FHKTX (0) vs ECCGX (1000). ECCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.11 vs. FHKTX (14.87). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 0.29 vs. ECCGX (-33.64).
| ECCGX | FHKTX | ECCGX / FHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 1.43 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 1.43 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.264 | 10.802 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.7M | 1.15B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.05 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.11 | 14.87 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.38 | 23.74 | -77% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.64 | 0.29 | -11,556% |
| Returns for 10 years | -35.22 | 15.69 | -224% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement