Ad is loading...
ECCGX vs FHKTX
ECCGX vs FHKTX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs FHKTX
Eaton Vance Greater China Growth C
Price$12.86
Change-$0.34 (-2.58%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$40.33
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs FHKTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
ECCGX vs. FHKTX commentary
Oct 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a StrongSell and FHKTX is a StrongSell.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. ECCGX (37.9M). FHKTX pays higher dividends than ECCGX: FHKTX (1.22) vs ECCGX (0.00). ECCGX was incepted earlier than FHKTX: ECCGX (31 years) vs FHKTX (16 years). ECCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FHKTX (24.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCGX: FHKTX (0) vs ECCGX (1000). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.76 vs. ECCGX (-2.80). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 17.58 vs. ECCGX (-41.10).
| ECCGX | FHKTX | ECCGX / FHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.544 | 28.544 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.9M | 1.2B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.80 | 30.76 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | -45.57 | -18.39 | 248% |
| Returns for 5 years | -41.10 | 17.58 | -234% |
| Returns for 10 years | -33.81 | 25.46 | -133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers