Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs FHKTX
ECCGX vs FHKTX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs FHKTX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$16.53
Change-$0.11 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.74M
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$51.98
Change-$0.21 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
ECCGX vs FHKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. FHKTX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Hold and FHKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. ECCGX (43.7M). ECCGX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: ECCGX (1.03) vs FHKTX (0.77). ECCGX was incepted earlier than FHKTX: ECCGX (32 years) vs FHKTX (18 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). ECCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCGX: FHKTX (0) vs ECCGX (1000). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.00 vs. ECCGX (32.64). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : -2.63 vs. ECCGX (-39.07).
| ECCGX | FHKTX | ECCGX / FHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 1.43 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 1.43 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.992 | 37.162 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.7M | 1.81B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.77 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.64 | 36.00 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.19 | 75.56 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -39.07 | -2.63 | 1,485% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.19 | 81.58 | -19% |