Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs MCDFX
ECCGX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs MCDFX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$14.94
Change+$0.12 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.76M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.32
Change+$0.15 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.37M
ECCGX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. MCDFX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 90.4M vs. ECCGX (39.8M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than ECCGX: MCDFX (3.26) vs ECCGX (1.16). ECCGX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: ECCGX (32 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). ECCGX (77.00) and MCDFX (75.80) have comparable annual turnover. ECCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: ECCGX (1000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX (26.46) and ECCGX (25.64) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -12.86 vs. ECCGX (-38.32).
| ECCGX | MCDFX | ECCGX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 1.32 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 1.32 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.884 | 13.843 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.8M | 90.4M | 44% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 3.26 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.64 | 26.46 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.82 | 2.45 | -647% |
| Returns for 5 years | -38.32 | -12.86 | 298% |
| Returns for 10 years | -30.60 | 10.92 | -280% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement