Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs MCDFX
ECCGX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs MCDFX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$15.47
Change-$0.03 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.09M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.12
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.69M
ECCGX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. MCDFX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 95.7M vs. ECCGX (41.1M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than ECCGX: MCDFX (3.08) vs ECCGX (1.13). ECCGX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: ECCGX (32 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). ECCGX (77.00) and MCDFX (75.80) have comparable annual turnover. ECCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: ECCGX (1000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.73 vs. ECCGX (36.07). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -7.64 vs. ECCGX (-35.56).
| ECCGX | MCDFX | ECCGX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 1.32 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 1.32 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.155 | 21.882 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.1M | 95.7M | 43% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 3.08 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.07 | 38.73 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.45 | 13.41 | -56% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.56 | -7.64 | 465% |
| Returns for 10 years | -23.39 | 23.36 | -100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement