Ad is loading...
ECCGX vs MCDFX
ECCGX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs MCDFX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$14.43
Change-$0.05 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.77M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$12.85
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
ECCGX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. MCDFX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. ECCGX (37.8M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than ECCGX: MCDFX (3.72) vs ECCGX (1.24). ECCGX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: ECCGX (31 years) vs MCDFX (15 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.17). ECCGX (77.00) and MCDFX (75.80) have comparable annual turnover. ECCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: ECCGX (1000) vs MCDFX (2500). ECCGX (17.42) and MCDFX (16.66) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -3.06 vs. ECCGX (-32.51).
| ECCGX | MCDFX | ECCGX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 1.17 | 193% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 1.17 | 229% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.860 | 8.806 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.8M | 93.9M | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 3.72 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.42 | 16.66 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.52 | 6.49 | -147% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.51 | -3.06 | 1,063% |
| Returns for 10 years | -36.45 | 0.78 | -4,652% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers