Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs MCDFX
ECCGX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs MCDFX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$14.65
Change-$0.09 (-0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.71M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.15
Change-$0.07 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.33M
ECCGX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. MCDFX commentary
Jun 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 88.3M vs. ECCGX (38.7M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than ECCGX: MCDFX (3.62) vs ECCGX (1.20). ECCGX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: ECCGX (32 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). ECCGX (77.00) and MCDFX (75.80) have comparable annual turnover. ECCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: ECCGX (1000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX (21.61) and ECCGX (21.11) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -5.84 vs. ECCGX (-33.64).
| ECCGX | MCDFX | ECCGX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 1.32 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 1.32 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.264 | 11.939 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.7M | 88.3M | 44% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 3.62 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.11 | 21.61 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.38 | 0.07 | -24,813% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.64 | -5.84 | 576% |
| Returns for 10 years | -35.22 | 1.25 | -2,828% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers