Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs TRCLX
ECCGX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs TRCLX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$16.06
Change+$0.15 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.09M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.35
Change+$0.11 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.76M
ECCGX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 59.8M vs. ECCGX (41.1M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than ECCGX: TRCLX (1.56) vs ECCGX (1.13). ECCGX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: ECCGX (32 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. ECCGX (77.00). ECCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: ECCGX (1000) vs TRCLX (500000). ECCGX (44.16) and TRCLX (42.94) have marching annual gain over last year. TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -6.52 vs. ECCGX (-37.11).
| ECCGX | TRCLX | ECCGX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 1.03 | 219% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 2.10 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.333 | 25.379 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.1M | 59.8M | 69% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.56 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.16 | 42.94 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.81 | 13.47 | -51% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.11 | -6.52 | 569% |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.54 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement