Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs TRCLX
ECCGX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs TRCLX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$17.47
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.5M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$14.10
Change+$0.05 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.7M
ECCGX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. TRCLX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 66.7M vs. ECCGX (45.5M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than ECCGX: TRCLX (1.34) vs ECCGX (0.99). ECCGX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: ECCGX (32 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. ECCGX (77.00). ECCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: ECCGX (1000) vs TRCLX (500000). ECCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.56 vs. TRCLX (18.81). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 0.52 vs. ECCGX (-30.29).
| ECCGX | TRCLX | ECCGX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 1.03 | 219% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 2.10 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.271 | 33.049 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.5M | 66.7M | 68% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 1.34 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.56 | 18.81 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.44 | 33.99 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.29 | 0.52 | -5,862% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.73 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement