Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCPX vs GFFFX
ECCPX vs GFFFX Comparison
Open Charts ECCPX vs GFFFX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Gr C
Price$50.00
Change+$0.21 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.43M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$85.85
Change+$0.53 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
ECCPX vs GFFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCPX vs. GFFFX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCPX is a Buy and GFFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. ECCPX (160M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than ECCPX: GFFFX (0.52) vs ECCPX (0.00). ECCPX was incepted earlier than GFFFX: ECCPX (25 years) vs GFFFX (17 years). ECCPX (1.98) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ECCPX (8.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCPX: GFFFX (250) vs ECCPX (1000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.09 vs. ECCPX (8.64). GFFFX (39.11) and ECCPX (37.73) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ECCPX | GFFFX | ECCPX / GFFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.40 | 495% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.40 | 495% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.666 | 15.748 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160M | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.52 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.64 | 16.09 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.16 | 55.50 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.73 | 39.11 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 176.46 | 101.51 | 174% |