Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCPX vs RGEBX
ECCPX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts ECCPX vs RGEBX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Gr C
Price$49.62
Change+$0.30 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets166.9M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$82.38
Change+$0.43 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
ECCPX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCPX vs. RGEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCPX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. ECCPX (167M). ECCPX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECCPX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: ECCPX (25 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). ECCPX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ECCPX (8.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCPX: RGEBX (250) vs ECCPX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.15 vs. ECCPX (2.07). ECCPX return over 5 years is better than : 37.46 vs. RGEBX (30.81).
| ECCPX | RGEBX | ECCPX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.09 | 182% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.09 | 182% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.669 | 15.314 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 167M | 327B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.07 | 6.15 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.20 | 60.18 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.46 | 30.81 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.44 | 81.54 | 196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement