Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCPX vs RGEBX
ECCPX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts ECCPX vs RGEBX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Gr C
Price$49.96
Change-$0.23 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.88M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$83.30
Change-$0.80 (-0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.37B
ECCPX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCPX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCPX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. ECCPX (161M). ECCPX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECCPX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: ECCPX (25 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). ECCPX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ECCPX (8.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCPX: RGEBX (250) vs ECCPX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.10 vs. ECCPX (7.38). ECCPX return over 5 years is better than : 48.84 vs. RGEBX (43.73).
| ECCPX | RGEBX | ECCPX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.09 | 182% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.09 | 182% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.515 | 16.601 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161M | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.38 | 12.10 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.73 | 70.06 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.84 | 43.73 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 196.11 | 105.49 | 186% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers