ECDA
Price
$0.33
Change
-$0.02 (-5.71%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:17 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
29.99M
NIOIF
Price
$3.61
Change
+$0.03 (+0.84%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
26.71B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ECDA vs NIOIF

Header iconECDA vs NIOIF Comparison
Open Charts ECDA vs NIOIFBanner chart's image
ECD Automotive Design
Price$0.33
Change-$0.02 (-5.71%)
Volume$892
Capitalization29.99M
NIO
Price$3.61
Change+$0.03 (+0.84%)
Volume$11.55K
Capitalization26.71B
ECDA vs NIOIF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ECDA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECDA vs. NIOIF commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECDA is a Hold and NIOIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ECDA: $0.35 vs. NIOIF: $3.61)
Brand notoriety: ECDA and NIOIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECDA: 49% vs. NIOIF: 741%
Market capitalization -- ECDA: $29.99M vs. NIOIF: $26.71B
ECDA [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $29.99M. NIOIF’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $26.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $559.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $35.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECDA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNIOIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ECDA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NIOIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ECDA is a better buy in the long-term than NIOIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECDA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ECDA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

ECDA (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +33.02% price change this week, while NIOIF (@Motor Vehicles) price change was -7.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

ECDA is expected to report earnings on Apr 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (-1.00% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NIOIF($26.7B) has a higher market cap than ECDA($30M). NIOIF YTD gains are higher at: -21.561 vs. ECDA (-63.323). ECDA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 544K vs. NIOIF (-17.04B). ECDA has less debt than NIOIF: ECDA (4.99M) vs NIOIF (28.4B). NIOIF has higher revenues than ECDA: NIOIF (50B) vs ECDA (17M).
ECDANIOIFECDA / NIOIF
Capitalization30M26.7B0%
EBITDA544K-17.04B-0%
Gain YTD-63.323-21.561294%
P/E Ratio46.47N/A-
Revenue17M50B0%
Total CashN/A32.6B-
Total Debt4.99M28.4B0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECDA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ECDA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GEGTX76.54N/A
N/A
Columbia Large Cap Growth Inst
ALCZX22.04N/A
N/A
Alger International Opportunities Z
SAPEX18.31N/A
N/A
Spectrum Active Advantage Investor
WSCRX33.77N/A
N/A
Allspring Small Company Growth R6
CLEYX21.02N/A
N/A
Columbia Select Large Cap Equity Inst3

ECDA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ECDA and CENN have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECDA and CENN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECDA
1D Price
Change %
ECDA100%
+12.49%
CENN - ECDA
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.07%
RACE - ECDA
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
LVWR - ECDA
18%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
NWTN - ECDA
13%
Poorly correlated
-12.50%
NIOIF - ECDA
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
More

NIOIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NIOIF and DRPRY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NIOIF and DRPRY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NIOIF
1D Price
Change %
NIOIF100%
+0.84%
DRPRY - NIOIF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
GELYY - NIOIF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
DRPRF - NIOIF
19%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ECDA - NIOIF
13%
Poorly correlated
+12.49%
CJET - NIOIF
5%
Poorly correlated
+9.47%
More