ECDP
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 28 closing price
Capitalization
1.53M
MBHCF
Price
$1.00
Change
-$0.26 (-20.63%)
Updated
Jul 5 closing price
Capitalization
9.12M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ECDP vs MBHCF

Header iconECDP vs MBHCF Comparison
Open Charts ECDP vs MBHCFBanner chart's image
Eco Depot
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.6K
Capitalization1.53M
MBH
Price$1.00
Change-$0.26 (-20.63%)
Volume$100
Capitalization9.12M
ECDP vs MBHCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ECDP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECDP vs. MBHCF commentary
Jul 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECDP is a Buy and MBHCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 29, 2025
Stock price -- (ECDP: $0.04 vs. MBHCF: $1.00)
Brand notoriety: ECDP and MBHCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECDP: 5% vs. MBHCF: 100%
Market capitalization -- ECDP: $1.53M vs. MBHCF: $9.12M
ECDP [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $1.53M. MBHCF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $9.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECDP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMBHCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ECDP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MBHCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBHCF is a better buy in the long-term than ECDP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECDP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ECDP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

ECDP (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +8.37% price change this week, while MBHCF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -0.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.87%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-0.55% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBHCF($9.12M) has a higher market cap than ECDP($1.53M). MBHCF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. ECDP (-24.683).
ECDPMBHCFECDP / MBHCF
Capitalization1.53M9.12M17%
EBITDAN/A8.07M-
Gain YTD-24.6830.000-
P/E RatioN/A3.93-
RevenueN/A109M-
Total CashN/A6.09M-
Total DebtN/A45.1M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ECDP: Fundamental Ratings
ECDP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
88
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
92
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECDPMBHCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
14%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ECDP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NUS8.890.14
+1.60%
NuSkin Enterprises
IMVT16.76-0.19
-1.12%
Immunovant
SPRO2.30-0.03
-1.29%
Spero Therapeutics
CSL427.56-7.55
-1.74%
Carlisle Companies
WINT0.92-0.06
-6.08%
Windtree Therapeutics Inc.

ECDP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ECDP and CNGKY have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECDP and CNGKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECDP
1D Price
Change %
ECDP100%
N/A
CNGKY - ECDP
5%
Poorly correlated
-6.06%
OPAD - ECDP
1%
Poorly correlated
-9.44%
MBHCF - ECDP
-6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COMP - ECDP
-6%
Poorly correlated
+1.80%
REAX - ECDP
-6%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
More

MBHCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MBHCF and BVERS have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBHCF and BVERS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBHCF
1D Price
Change %
MBHCF100%
N/A
BVERS - MBHCF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNGKY - MBHCF
7%
Poorly correlated
-6.06%
BRST - MBHCF
6%
Poorly correlated
-27.18%
OPAD - MBHCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-9.44%
OPEN - MBHCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-7.87%
More