Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECFGX vs RGACX
ECFGX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts ECFGX vs RGACX
Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opps C
Price$25.73
Change+$0.13 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets125.33M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.45
Change+$0.74 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.08B
ECFGX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFGX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFGX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 335B vs. ECFGX (125M). RGACX pays higher dividends than ECFGX: RGACX (0.07) vs ECFGX (0.00). ECFGX was incepted earlier than RGACX: ECFGX (15 years) vs RGACX (24 years). ECFGX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ECFGX (23.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFGX: RGACX (250) vs ECFGX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.53 vs. ECFGX (6.05). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 31.36 vs. ECFGX (-10.43).
| ECFGX | RGACX | ECFGX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.94 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.94 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.626 | 18.697 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 125M | 335B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.05 | 7.53 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.03 | 63.83 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.43 | 31.36 | -33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.59 | 90.33 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers