Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECFGX vs RGACX
ECFGX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts ECFGX vs RGACX
Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opps C
Price$24.98
Change-$0.10 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets123.55M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.53
Change-$0.52 (-0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.43B
ECFGX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFGX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFGX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. ECFGX (124M). RGACX pays higher dividends than ECFGX: RGACX (0.07) vs ECFGX (0.00). ECFGX was incepted earlier than RGACX: ECFGX (15 years) vs RGACX (23 years). ECFGX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ECFGX (23.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFGX: RGACX (250) vs ECFGX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.89 vs. ECFGX (7.13). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.57 vs. ECFGX (-5.54).
| ECFGX | RGACX | ECFGX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.94 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.94 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.318 | 17.419 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 124M | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.13 | 10.89 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.64 | 71.84 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.54 | 37.57 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.21 | 95.48 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement