Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECFGX vs RGEBX
ECFGX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts ECFGX vs RGEBX
Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opps C
Price$24.98
Change-$0.10 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets123.55M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$83.78
Change-$0.52 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.43B
ECFGX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFGX vs. RGEBX commentary
Oct 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFGX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. ECFGX (124M). ECFGX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECFGX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: ECFGX (15 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). ECFGX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ECFGX (23.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFGX: RGEBX (250) vs ECFGX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.64 vs. ECFGX (7.13). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.29 vs. ECFGX (-5.54).
| ECFGX | RGEBX | ECFGX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 1.09 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 1.09 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.318 | 17.273 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 124M | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.13 | 10.64 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.64 | 70.87 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.54 | 36.29 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.21 | 90.96 | 75% |