Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECFGX vs RGEBX
ECFGX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts ECFGX vs RGEBX
Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opps C
Price$25.73
Change+$0.13 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets125.33M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$84.68
Change+$0.73 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.08B
ECFGX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFGX vs. RGEBX commentary
Nov 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFGX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 335B vs. ECFGX (125M). ECFGX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECFGX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: ECFGX (15 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). ECFGX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ECFGX (23.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFGX: RGEBX (250) vs ECFGX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.30 vs. ECFGX (6.05). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 30.13 vs. ECFGX (-10.43).
| ECFGX | RGEBX | ECFGX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 1.09 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 1.09 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.626 | 18.533 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 125M | 335B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.05 | 7.30 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.03 | 62.89 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.43 | 30.13 | -35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.59 | 85.95 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers