Ad is loading...
ECFVX vs RMFCX
ECFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ECFVX vs RMFCX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps C
Price$16.75
Change-$0.32 (-1.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.13M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$50.23
Change-$0.51 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.16B
ECFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 93.2B vs. ECFVX (234M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than ECFVX: RMFCX (1.34) vs ECFVX (0.47). ECFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ECFVX (14 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). ECFVX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). ECFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFVX: RMFCX (250) vs ECFVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.21 vs. ECFVX (-11.12). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 48.93 vs. ECFVX (31.57).
| ECFVX | RMFCX | ECFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.91 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.91 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.535 | -6.760 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 234M | 93.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.34 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.12 | -3.21 | 347% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.39 | 0.36 | -2,897% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.57 | 48.93 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.96 | 47.77 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...