Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECFVX vs RMFCX
ECFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ECFVX vs RMFCX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps C
Price$19.87
Change-$0.04 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.44M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.02
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
ECFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. ECFVX (237M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than ECFVX: RMFCX (1.21) vs ECFVX (0.44). ECFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ECFVX (15 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). ECFVX (1.81) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). ECFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFVX: RMFCX (250) vs ECFVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. ECFVX (-5.13). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.67 vs. ECFVX (25.86).
| ECFVX | RMFCX | ECFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.91 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.91 | 199% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.350 | 12.783 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 237M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 1.21 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.13 | 6.00 | -86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.83 | 27.94 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.86 | 52.67 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.09 | 84.73 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers