Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECFVX vs RMFCX
ECFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ECFVX vs RMFCX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps C
Price$20.18
Change+$0.21 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets240.18M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.01
Change+$0.50 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
ECFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. ECFVX (240M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than ECFVX: RMFCX (1.20) vs ECFVX (0.44). ECFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ECFVX (15 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). ECFVX (1.81) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). ECFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFVX: RMFCX (250) vs ECFVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.54 vs. ECFVX (-3.98). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.04 vs. ECFVX (35.57).
| ECFVX | RMFCX | ECFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.91 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.91 | 199% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.665 | 14.613 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 240M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 1.20 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.98 | 5.54 | -72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.79 | 39.44 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.57 | 61.04 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.76 | 88.77 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers