Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECFVX vs RMFCX
ECFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ECFVX vs RMFCX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps C
Price$19.55
Change+$0.06 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.77M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.35
Change+$0.27 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.29B
ECFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFVX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. ECFVX (238M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than ECFVX: RMFCX (1.27) vs ECFVX (0.46). ECFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ECFVX (14 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). ECFVX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). ECFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFVX: RMFCX (250) vs ECFVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.02 vs. ECFVX (1.28). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.41 vs. ECFVX (40.48).
| ECFVX | RMFCX | ECFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.91 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.91 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.149 | 9.394 | 23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 238M | 108B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 1.27 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.28 | 11.02 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.56 | 29.32 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.48 | 61.41 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.44 | 78.04 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement