Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECFVX vs RMFCX
ECFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ECFVX vs RMFCX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps C
Price$18.60
Change-$0.07 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets219.61M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$56.01
Change-$0.14 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.21B
ECFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. ECFVX (220M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than ECFVX: RMFCX (1.37) vs ECFVX (0.49). ECFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ECFVX (14 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). ECFVX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). ECFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFVX: RMFCX (250) vs ECFVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.22 vs. ECFVX (-6.19). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.17 vs. ECFVX (39.03).
| ECFVX | RMFCX | ECFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.91 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.91 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.149 | 2.924 | -73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 220M | 103B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.37 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.19 | 5.22 | -118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.67 | 18.48 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.03 | 59.17 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.02 | 61.78 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement