Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECFVX vs RMFCX
ECFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ECFVX vs RMFCX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps C
Price$18.89
Change-$0.18 (-0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets232.47M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.52
Change-$0.44 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
ECFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. ECFVX (232M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than ECFVX: RMFCX (1.31) vs ECFVX (0.47). ECFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ECFVX (14 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). ECFVX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). ECFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFVX: RMFCX (250) vs ECFVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. ECFVX (-2.45). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.85 vs. ECFVX (33.59).
| ECFVX | RMFCX | ECFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.91 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.91 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.996 | 6.021 | -17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 232M | 106B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.31 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.45 | 8.70 | -28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.61 | 28.43 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.59 | 59.85 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.98 | 69.75 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement