Ad is loading...
ECFVX vs RMFEX
ECFVX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts ECFVX vs RMFEX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps C
Price$19.41
Change-$0.16 (-0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.06M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$57.50
Change-$0.33 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.79B
ECFVX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFVX vs. RMFEX commentary
Mar 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFVX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. ECFVX (252M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than ECFVX: RMFEX (1.95) vs ECFVX (0.16). ECFVX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: ECFVX (14 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). ECFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. RMFEX (25.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFVX: RMFEX (250) vs ECFVX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.63 vs. ECFVX (6.60). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 60.84 vs. ECFVX (32.74).
| ECFVX | RMFEX | ECFVX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.568 | 5.299 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 252M | 106B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 1.95 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.60 | 11.63 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.85 | 20.86 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.74 | 60.84 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.06 | 72.99 | 54% |