Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECFVX vs RMFEX
ECFVX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts ECFVX vs RMFEX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps C
Price$18.81
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets232.47M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$57.50
Change+$0.22 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.92B
ECFVX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFVX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFVX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. ECFVX (232M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than ECFVX: RMFEX (1.58) vs ECFVX (0.47). ECFVX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: ECFVX (14 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). ECFVX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). ECFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFVX: RMFEX (250) vs ECFVX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.69 vs. ECFVX (-5.25). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 55.83 vs. ECFVX (28.14).
| ECFVX | RMFEX | ECFVX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.62 | 281% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.62 | 289% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.520 | 5.102 | -30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 232M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.58 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.25 | 8.69 | -60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.82 | 19.13 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.14 | 55.83 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.75 | 74.62 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement