Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECFVX vs RMFEX
ECFVX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts ECFVX vs RMFEX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps C
Price$20.18
Change+$0.21 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets240.18M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$62.40
Change+$0.51 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
ECFVX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFVX vs. RMFEX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFVX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. ECFVX (240M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than ECFVX: RMFEX (1.46) vs ECFVX (0.44). ECFVX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: ECFVX (15 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). ECFVX (1.81) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). ECFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFVX: RMFEX (250) vs ECFVX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.87 vs. ECFVX (-3.98). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 63.57 vs. ECFVX (35.57).
| ECFVX | RMFEX | ECFVX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.62 | 281% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.62 | 292% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.665 | 14.880 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 240M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 1.46 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.98 | 5.87 | -68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.79 | 40.73 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.57 | 63.57 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.76 | 96.37 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement