Ad is loading...
ECFVX vs RMFEX
ECFVX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts ECFVX vs RMFEX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps C
Price$16.75
Change-$0.32 (-1.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.13M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$50.54
Change-$0.51 (-1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.16B
ECFVX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFVX vs. RMFEX commentary
Apr 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFVX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 93.2B vs. ECFVX (234M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than ECFVX: RMFEX (1.61) vs ECFVX (0.47). ECFVX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: ECFVX (14 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). ECFVX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). ECFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFVX: RMFEX (250) vs ECFVX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.89 vs. ECFVX (-11.12). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 51.27 vs. ECFVX (31.57).
| ECFVX | RMFEX | ECFVX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.62 | 281% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.62 | 289% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.535 | -6.687 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 234M | 93.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.61 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.12 | -2.89 | 385% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.39 | 1.29 | -807% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.57 | 51.27 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.96 | 53.46 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...