Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECFVX vs RMFEX
ECFVX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts ECFVX vs RMFEX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps C
Price$19.55
Change+$0.06 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.77M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$59.71
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.29B
ECFVX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFVX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFVX is a StrongBuy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. ECFVX (238M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than ECFVX: RMFEX (1.53) vs ECFVX (0.46). ECFVX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: ECFVX (14 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). ECFVX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). ECFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFVX: RMFEX (250) vs ECFVX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.36 vs. ECFVX (1.28). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 63.91 vs. ECFVX (40.48).
| ECFVX | RMFEX | ECFVX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.62 | 281% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.62 | 289% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.149 | 9.546 | 23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 238M | 108B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 1.53 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.28 | 11.36 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.56 | 30.54 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.48 | 63.91 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.44 | 84.99 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement