Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECFVX vs RWMHX
ECFVX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts ECFVX vs RWMHX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps C
Price$19.87
Change-$0.04 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.44M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$66.12
Change+$0.23 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.68B
ECFVX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFVX vs. RWMHX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFVX is a Hold and RWMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. ECFVX (237M). RWMHX pays higher dividends than ECFVX: RWMHX (1.33) vs ECFVX (0.44). ECFVX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: ECFVX (15 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). ECFVX (1.81) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). ECFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFVX: RWMHX (250) vs ECFVX (1000). RWMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.48 vs. ECFVX (-5.13). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 44.42 vs. ECFVX (25.86).
| ECFVX | RWMHX | ECFVX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.41 | 424% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.41 | 441% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.350 | 8.808 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 237M | 204B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 1.33 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.13 | 4.48 | -114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.83 | 29.53 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.86 | 44.42 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.09 | 71.77 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement