ECGS
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.01 (-7.14%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
5.54M
GRUSF
Price
$0.37
Change
-$0.02 (-5.13%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
29.65M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ECGS vs GRUSF

Header iconECGS vs GRUSF Comparison
Open Charts ECGS vs GRUSFBanner chart's image
Eco-Growth Strategies
Price$0.13
Change-$0.01 (-7.14%)
Volume$5.5K
Capitalization5.54M
Grown Rogue International
Price$0.37
Change-$0.02 (-5.13%)
Volume$114.46K
Capitalization29.65M
ECGS vs GRUSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GRUSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECGS vs. GRUSF commentary
May 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECGS is a Hold and GRUSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 24, 2025
Stock price -- (ECGS: $0.13 vs. GRUSF: $0.37)
Brand notoriety: ECGS and GRUSF are both not notable
ECGS represents the Tobacco, while GRUSF is part of the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECGS: 6% vs. GRUSF: 49%
Market capitalization -- ECGS: $5.54M vs. GRUSF: $29.65M
ECGS [@Tobacco] is valued at $5.54M. GRUSF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $29.65M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Tobacco] industry ranges from $272.75B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $77.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Tobacco] industry is $29.48B. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $3.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECGS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRUSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ECGS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GRUSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ECGS is a better buy in the long-term than GRUSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRUSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GRUSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

ECGS (@Tobacco) experienced а +8.71% price change this week, while GRUSF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -7.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tobacco industry was +0.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.46%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

GRUSF is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Tobacco (+0.45% weekly)

The industry is engaged in the growth, preparation for sale, advertisement, and distribution of tobacco and tobacco-related products like cigarettes. In 2017, tobacco companies spent an estimated $9.36 billion marketing cigarettes and smokeless tobacco in the U.S. – an amount that translates to more than $25 million each day (according to a CDC report). Philip Morris International Inc., Altria Group Inc., and British American Tobacco plc are some major cigar makers. In recent times, vaping or the use of e-cigarette (does not burn tobacco) is gaining momentum – several established cigarette makers are trying to expand their footprint in this new market.

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-0.70% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRUSF($29.6M) has a higher market cap than ECGS($5.54M). ECGS YTD gains are higher at: 167.347 vs. GRUSF (-42.862).
ECGSGRUSFECGS / GRUSF
Capitalization5.54M29.6M19%
EBITDAN/A4.08M-
Gain YTD167.347-42.862-390%
P/E RatioN/A11.90-
RevenueN/A18.6M-
Total CashN/A3.49M-
Total DebtN/A6.09M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ECGS vs GRUSF: Fundamental Ratings
ECGS
GRUSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2387
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9453
SMR RATING
1..100
10091
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3865
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10098
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GRUSF's Valuation (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECGS (92). This means that GRUSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECGS’s over the last 12 months.

GRUSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECGS (94). This means that GRUSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECGS’s over the last 12 months.

GRUSF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as ECGS (100). This means that GRUSF’s stock grew similarly to ECGS’s over the last 12 months.

ECGS's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as GRUSF (65). This means that ECGS’s stock grew similarly to GRUSF’s over the last 12 months.

GRUSF's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as ECGS (100). This means that GRUSF’s stock grew similarly to ECGS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRUSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRUSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JNOSX50.490.10
+0.20%
Janus Henderson Overseas D
EQICX12.50N/A
N/A
Allspring Emerging Markets Eq Advtg C
GSICX27.70N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs International Eq ESG C
MBBRX11.36N/A
N/A
MassMutual Balanced R4
SGIIX74.47-0.32
-0.43%
First Eagle Global I

ECGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ECGS and ELTP have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECGS and ELTP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECGS
1D Price
Change %
ECGS100%
-9.66%
ELTP - ECGS
15%
Poorly correlated
+2.33%
GRUSF - ECGS
14%
Poorly correlated
-4.10%
CURLF - ECGS
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
CXXIF - ECGS
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.81%
CTTH - ECGS
7%
Poorly correlated
-7.47%
More

GRUSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRUSF has been loosely correlated with GLASF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GRUSF jumps, then GLASF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRUSF
1D Price
Change %
GRUSF100%
-4.10%
GLASF - GRUSF
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.64%
TSNDF - GRUSF
33%
Poorly correlated
+3.58%
TCNNF - GRUSF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
VRNOF - GRUSF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
CURLF - GRUSF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
More