| ECH | FLAU | ECH / FLAU | |
| Gain YTD | 39.529 | 17.721 | 223% |
| Net Assets | 770M | 79.4M | 970% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.09 | 667% |
| Turnover | 31.00 | 6.07 | 511% |
| Yield | 2.31 | 3.22 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 8 years | - |
| ECH | FLAU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 89% | 10 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 15 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 72% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECH has been loosely correlated with LTM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ECH jumps, then LTM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that FLAU and TLS have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLAU and TLS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLAU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLAU | 100% | +0.73% | ||
| TLS - FLAU | 6% Poorly correlated | +9.24% | ||
| WOW - FLAU | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.39% | ||
| SOL - FLAU | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.54% | ||
| ASX - FLAU | 3% Poorly correlated | +2.89% | ||
| WOR - FLAU | -0% Poorly correlated | +2.03% | ||
More | ||||