It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ECIA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHBIO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ECIA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HBIO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ECIA (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -16.67% price change this week, while HBIO (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was +0.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.24%.
HBIO is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
ECIA | HBIO | ECIA / HBIO | |
Capitalization | 2.97M | 23.6M | 13% |
EBITDA | -394.15K | -47.68M | 1% |
Gain YTD | -44.444 | -74.929 | 59% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 6.5M | 91.4M | 7% |
Total Cash | 348K | 5.55M | 6% |
Total Debt | 1.31M | 44.6M | 3% |
ECIA | HBIO | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 85 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ECIA's Valuation (69) in the null industry is in the same range as HBIO (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that ECIA’s stock grew similarly to HBIO’s over the last 12 months.
ECIA's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HBIO (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that ECIA’s stock grew similarly to HBIO’s over the last 12 months.
ECIA's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as HBIO (99) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that ECIA’s stock grew similarly to HBIO’s over the last 12 months.
HBIO's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECIA (95) in the null industry. This means that HBIO’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECIA’s over the last 12 months.
HBIO's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as ECIA (6) in the null industry. This means that HBIO’s stock grew similarly to ECIA’s over the last 12 months.
ECIA | HBIO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago80% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago83% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago81% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago84% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago77% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago77% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago72% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 13 days ago86% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago75% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% | 2 days ago88% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ECIA and RDNT have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECIA and RDNT's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECIA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ECIA | 100% | +14.45% | ||
RDNT - ECIA | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.89% | ||
QTRX - ECIA | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.66% | ||
SEMHF - ECIA | 23% Poorly correlated | +5.05% | ||
HBIO - ECIA | 23% Poorly correlated | +8.09% | ||
BFLY - ECIA | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.42% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBIO has been loosely correlated with IRMD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HBIO jumps, then IRMD could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HBIO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HBIO | 100% | +8.09% | ||
IRMD - HBIO | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
A - HBIO | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
RVTY - HBIO | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.49% | ||
MTD - HBIO | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
NEOG - HBIO | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.27% | ||
More |