It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ECIA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRDNT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RDNT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
ECIA (@Medical Specialties) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RDNT (@Medical Specialties) price change was +9.72% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -4.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.14%.
ECIA is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
RDNT is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.
Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.
ECIA | RDNT | ECIA / RDNT | |
Capitalization | 5.41M | 3.55B | 0% |
EBITDA | -529.03K | 293M | -0% |
Gain YTD | -1.176 | 128.875 | -1% |
P/E Ratio | 47.17 | 962.00 | 5% |
Revenue | 7.15M | 1.62B | 0% |
Total Cash | 120K | 343M | 0% |
Total Debt | 976K | 1.49B | 0% |
ECIA | RDNT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | 79 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ECIA's Valuation (69) in the null industry is in the same range as RDNT (93) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that ECIA’s stock grew similarly to RDNT’s over the last 12 months.
RDNT's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for ECIA (92) in the null industry. This means that RDNT’s stock grew significantly faster than ECIA’s over the last 12 months.
RDNT's SMR Rating (86) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as ECIA (92) in the null industry. This means that RDNT’s stock grew similarly to ECIA’s over the last 12 months.
RDNT's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as ECIA (58) in the null industry. This means that RDNT’s stock grew similarly to ECIA’s over the last 12 months.
ECIA's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RDNT (79) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that ECIA’s stock grew significantly faster than RDNT’s over the last 12 months.
RDNT | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago74% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago74% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago78% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago69% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago70% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago85% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
VIVIX | 68.70 | -0.26 | -0.38% |
Vanguard Value Index I | |||
RTIUX | 11.68 | -0.05 | -0.43% |
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Intl Eq M | |||
LMVVX | 32.58 | -0.27 | -0.82% |
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value R5 | |||
ARSIX | 17.73 | -0.15 | -0.84% |
AMG River Road Small Cap Value I | |||
LSSCX | 25.61 | -0.30 | -1.16% |
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Instl |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ECIA and RDNT have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECIA and RDNT's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECIA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ECIA | 100% | N/A | ||
RDNT - ECIA | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.83% | ||
QTRX - ECIA | 24% Poorly correlated | -4.03% | ||
SEMHF - ECIA | 23% Poorly correlated | -3.40% | ||
HBIO - ECIA | 23% Poorly correlated | -6.55% | ||
BFLY - ECIA | 21% Poorly correlated | -8.20% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RDNT has been loosely correlated with BLFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RDNT jumps, then BLFS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RDNT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RDNT | 100% | -1.83% | ||
BLFS - RDNT | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.91% | ||
AZTA - RDNT | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.62% | ||
NTRA - RDNT | 43% Loosely correlated | -3.34% | ||
QTRX - RDNT | 42% Loosely correlated | -4.03% | ||
NVRO - RDNT | 39% Loosely correlated | +11.06% | ||
More |