Advertisement
ECL vs LNXSF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECL is a StrongBuy and LNXSF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ECL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLNXSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ECL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LNXSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ECL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- ECL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ECL (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +2.38% price change this week, while LNXSF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -4.08% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +1.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.10%.
Reported Earning Dates
ECL is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.
LNXSF is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Specialty (+1.67% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
| ECL | LNXSF | ECL / LNXSF | |
| Capitalization | 66B | 2.91B | 2,265% |
| EBITDA | 3.03B | 840M | 360% |
| Gain YTD | 14.714 | 13.680 | 108% |
| P/E Ratio | 47.58 | 20.08 | 237% |
| Revenue | 15.3B | 8.06B | 190% |
| Total Cash | 920M | 1.93B | 48% |
| Total Debt | 8.73B | 4.23B | 206% |
ECL | LNXSF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 40 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 32 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LNXSF's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as ECL (91) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that LNXSF’s stock grew similarly to ECL’s over the last 12 months.
ECL's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LNXSF (100) in the null industry. This means that ECL’s stock grew somewhat faster than LNXSF’s over the last 12 months.
ECL's SMR Rating (40) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LNXSF (90) in the null industry. This means that ECL’s stock grew somewhat faster than LNXSF’s over the last 12 months.
ECL's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as LNXSF (61) in the null industry. This means that ECL’s stock grew similarly to LNXSF’s over the last 12 months.
LNXSF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECL (74) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that LNXSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECL’s over the last 12 months.
| ECL | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 52% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 38% |
Advertisement
ECL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECL has been loosely correlated with SHW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ECL jumps, then SHW could also see price increases.
LNXSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LNXSF and ECL have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LNXSF and ECL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LNXSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNXSF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ECL - LNXSF | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.60% | ||
| PPG - LNXSF | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.33% | ||
| KURRY - LNXSF | 4% Poorly correlated | +7.36% | ||
| MTLHF - LNXSF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MITUY - LNXSF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||