Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECLDX vs FUMBX
ECLDX vs FUMBX Comparison
Open Charts ECLDX vs FUMBX
Eaton Vance Short Duration Gov Inc C
Price$7.33
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.78B
Fidelity Shrt-Term Trs Bd Index
Price$10.43
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.32B
ECLDX vs FUMBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECLDX vs. FUMBX commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECLDX is a Hold and FUMBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUMBX has more cash in the bank: 3.32B vs. ECLDX (2.78B). ECLDX pays higher dividends than FUMBX: ECLDX (4.95) vs FUMBX (3.49). ECLDX was incepted earlier than FUMBX: ECLDX (23 years) vs FUMBX (8 years). ECLDX (2.00) is less costly to investors than FUMBX (0.03). ECLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 712.00 vs. FUMBX (42.00). FUMBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECLDX: FUMBX (0) vs ECLDX (1000). ECLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.72 vs. FUMBX (5.53). ECLDX return over 5 years is better than : 6.82 vs. FUMBX (5.10).
| ECLDX | FUMBX | ECLDX / FUMBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.03 | 6,667% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.03 | 6,667% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.808 | 5.086 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.78B | 3.32B | 84% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.95 | 3.49 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.72 | 5.53 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.03 | 14.05 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.82 | 5.10 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement