Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECMNX vs FYMNX
ECMNX vs FYMNX Comparison
Open Charts ECMNX vs FYMNX
Eaton Vance MN Municipal Income C
Price$9.28
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets231.4M
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond I
Price$10.44
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets645.55M
ECMNX vs FYMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECMNX vs. FYMNX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECMNX is a Hold and FYMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FYMNX has more cash in the bank: 646M vs. ECMNX (231M). FYMNX pays higher dividends than ECMNX: FYMNX (3.81) vs ECMNX (2.57). ECMNX was incepted earlier than FYMNX: ECMNX (20 years) vs FYMNX (28 years). ECMNX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FYMNX (0.59). ECMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FYMNX (26.00). ECMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FYMNX: ECMNX (1000) vs FYMNX (100000). FYMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.49 vs. ECMNX (-1.94). FYMNX return over 5 years is better than : 1.76 vs. ECMNX (-5.68).
| ECMNX | FYMNX | ECMNX / FYMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.59 | 247% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.59 | 247% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.727 | -1.453 | 188% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 231M | 646M | 36% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.57 | 3.81 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.94 | 0.49 | -395% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.10 | 7.55 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.68 | 1.76 | -323% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.42 | 20.04 | -12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers