Ad is loading...
ECMNX vs FYMNX
ECMNX vs FYMNX Comparison
Open Charts ECMNX vs FYMNX
Eaton Vance MN Municipal Income C
Price$9.31
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets229.58M
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond I
Price$10.43
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets653.16M
ECMNX vs FYMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECMNX vs. FYMNX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECMNX is a Hold and FYMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FYMNX has more cash in the bank: 653M vs. ECMNX (230M). FYMNX pays higher dividends than ECMNX: FYMNX (3.79) vs ECMNX (2.53). ECMNX was incepted earlier than FYMNX: ECMNX (19 years) vs FYMNX (28 years). ECMNX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FYMNX (0.59). ECMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FYMNX (26.00). ECMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FYMNX: ECMNX (1000) vs FYMNX (100000). FYMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.86 vs. ECMNX (-1.42). FYMNX return over 5 years is better than : 4.23 vs. ECMNX (-3.99).
| ECMNX | FYMNX | ECMNX / FYMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.59 | 247% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.59 | 247% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.310 | -1.577 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 230M | 653M | 35% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.53 | 3.79 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.42 | 0.86 | -164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.95 | 7.33 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.99 | 4.23 | -94% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.10 | 20.36 | -10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers