Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECMOX vs HULFX
ECMOX vs HULFX Comparison
Open Charts ECMOX vs HULFX
Eaton Vance MO Municipal Income C
Price$9.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.24M
Hawaiian Tax-Free Trust F
Price$10.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets380.45M
ECMOX vs HULFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECMOX vs. HULFX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECMOX is a Hold and HULFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HULFX has more cash in the bank: 380M vs. ECMOX (92.2M). ECMOX (2.66) and HULFX (2.61) have matching dividends . ECMOX was incepted earlier than HULFX: ECMOX (20 years) vs HULFX (7 years). ECMOX (1.46) is less costly to investors than HULFX (0.76). ECMOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. HULFX (18.00). HULFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECMOX: HULFX (0) vs ECMOX (1000). HULFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.09 vs. ECMOX (2.31). HULFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.70 vs. ECMOX (-3.21).
| ECMOX | HULFX | ECMOX / HULFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.76 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.76 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.134 | 3.607 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 92.2M | 380M | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.66 | 2.61 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.31 | 3.09 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.87 | 9.06 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.21 | 1.70 | -188% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.28 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement