Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECNCX vs HULFX
ECNCX vs HULFX Comparison
Open Charts ECNCX vs HULFX
Eaton Vance NC Municipal Income C
Price$9.03
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets239.41M
Hawaiian Tax-Free Trust F
Price$10.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets383.8M
ECNCX vs HULFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECNCX vs. HULFX commentary
Oct 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECNCX is a Hold and HULFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HULFX has more cash in the bank: 384M vs. ECNCX (239M). HULFX pays higher dividends than ECNCX: HULFX (2.57) vs ECNCX (2.29). ECNCX was incepted earlier than HULFX: ECNCX (19 years) vs HULFX (7 years). ECNCX (1.45) is less costly to investors than HULFX (0.76). ECNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. HULFX (18.00). HULFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECNCX: HULFX (0) vs ECNCX (1000). HULFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.54 vs. ECNCX (1.33). HULFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.76 vs. ECNCX (-1.66).
| ECNCX | HULFX | ECNCX / HULFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.76 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.76 | 191% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.943 | 3.041 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 239M | 384M | 62% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.29 | 2.57 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.33 | 2.54 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.07 | 10.33 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.66 | 1.76 | -95% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement