Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECNCX vs HULFX
ECNCX vs HULFX Comparison
Open Charts ECNCX vs HULFX
Eaton Vance NC Municipal Income C
Price$9.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.93M
Hawaiian Tax-Free Trust F
Price$10.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets380.45M
ECNCX vs HULFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECNCX vs. HULFX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECNCX is a Hold and HULFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HULFX has more cash in the bank: 380M vs. ECNCX (245M). HULFX pays higher dividends than ECNCX: HULFX (2.61) vs ECNCX (2.47). ECNCX was incepted earlier than HULFX: ECNCX (20 years) vs HULFX (7 years). ECNCX (1.45) is less costly to investors than HULFX (0.76). ECNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. HULFX (18.00). HULFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECNCX: HULFX (0) vs ECNCX (1000). HULFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.09 vs. ECNCX (1.89). HULFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.70 vs. ECNCX (-2.01).
| ECNCX | HULFX | ECNCX / HULFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.76 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.76 | 191% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.825 | 3.607 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 245M | 380M | 64% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.47 | 2.61 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.89 | 3.09 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.40 | 9.06 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.01 | 1.70 | -118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.74 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement