88 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECNS vs NOAH
ECNS vs NOAH Comparison
Open Charts ECNS vs NOAH
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
Price$37.87
Change+$0.38 (+1.01%)
Volume$384
Net Assets77.77M
Noah Holdings
Price$12.43
Change+$0.62 (+5.25%)
Volume$836
Capitalization823.85M
ECNS vs NOAH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECNS vs. NOAH commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECNS is a Hold and NOAH is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NOAH: Fundamental Ratings
NOAH | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ECNS | NOAH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 84% | 8 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ECNS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECNS has been closely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECNS jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECNS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECNS | 100% | -0.21% | ||
| WB - ECNS | 66% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| LU - ECNS | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.99% | ||
| NOAH - ECNS | 61% Loosely correlated | -4.22% | ||
| IQ - ECNS | 59% Loosely correlated | +6.36% | ||
| TIGR - ECNS | 57% Loosely correlated | +10.72% | ||
More | ||||
NOAH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NOAH and IVZ have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NOAH and IVZ's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NOAH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOAH | 100% | -4.22% | ||
| IVZ - NOAH | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.05% | ||
| BN - NOAH | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
| NTRSO - NOAH | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
| SSSS - NOAH | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| APAM - NOAH | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.57% | ||
More | ||||