Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECOAX vs RGFTX
ECOAX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts ECOAX vs RGFTX
Redwheel Next Generation Power Infras A
Price$11.01
Change-$0.10 (-0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets223.81M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$10.46
Change-$0.05 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets350.1M
ECOAX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECOAX vs. RGFTX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECOAX is a Hold and RGFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGFTX has more cash in the bank: 350M vs. ECOAX (224M). ECOAX pays higher dividends than RGFTX: ECOAX (3.43) vs RGFTX (3.01). ECOAX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: ECOAX (5 years) vs RGFTX (9 years). RGFTX (1.24) and ECOAX (1.20) have similar cost to investors . RGFTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. ECOAX (47.00). RGFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECOAX: RGFTX (0) vs ECOAX (2500). ECOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.24 vs. RGFTX (11.13). RGFTX return over 5 years is better than : 18.55 vs. ECOAX (12.36).
| ECOAX | RGFTX | ECOAX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.91 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.24 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.193 | 18.263 | 154% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 224M | 350M | 64% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.43 | 3.01 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.24 | 11.13 | 218% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.49 | 32.77 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.36 | 18.55 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers