Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECOAX vs VCRCX
ECOAX vs VCRCX Comparison
Open Charts ECOAX vs VCRCX
Redwheel Next Generation Power Infras A
Price$11.01
Change-$0.10 (-0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets223.81M
NYLI CBRE Global Infrastructure
Price$14.51
Change-$0.10 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
ECOAX vs VCRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECOAX vs. VCRCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECOAX is a Hold and VCRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VCRCX has more cash in the bank: 1.38B vs. ECOAX (224M). ECOAX pays higher dividends than VCRCX: ECOAX (3.43) vs VCRCX (0.98). ECOAX was incepted earlier than VCRCX: ECOAX (5 years) vs VCRCX (7 years). VCRCX (2.08) is less costly to investors than ECOAX (1.20). VCRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. ECOAX (47.00). VCRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECOAX: VCRCX (1000) vs ECOAX (2500). ECOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.24 vs. VCRCX (7.47). VCRCX return over 5 years is better than : 31.52 vs. ECOAX (12.36).
| ECOAX | VCRCX | ECOAX / VCRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 2.08 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 2.08 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.193 | 12.582 | 224% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 224M | 1.38B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.43 | 0.98 | 351% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.24 | 7.47 | 325% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.49 | 22.38 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.36 | 31.52 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement