Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECOAX vs VCRQX
ECOAX vs VCRQX Comparison
Open Charts ECOAX vs VCRQX
Redwheel Next Generation Power Infras A
Price$10.53
Change+$0.03 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.97M
NYLI CBRE Global Infrastructure Class R6
Price$14.65
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.34B
ECOAX vs VCRQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECOAX vs. VCRQX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECOAX is a StrongBuy and VCRQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VCRQX has more cash in the bank: 1.34B vs. ECOAX (209M). ECOAX pays higher dividends than VCRQX: ECOAX (3.66) vs VCRQX (2.09). ECOAX was incepted earlier than VCRQX: ECOAX (5 years) vs VCRQX (6 years). ECOAX (1.20) is less costly to investors than VCRQX (0.92). VCRQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. ECOAX (47.00). VCRQX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECOAX: VCRQX (0) vs ECOAX (2500). VCRQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.24 vs. ECOAX (6.65).
| ECOAX | VCRQX | ECOAX / VCRQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.92 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.92 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.154 | 13.575 | 156% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 209M | 1.34B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.66 | 2.09 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.65 | 9.24 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.60 | 24.26 | -23% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 45.51 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |