Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECOAX vs VCRQX
ECOAX vs VCRQX Comparison
Open Charts ECOAX vs VCRQX
Redwheel Next Generation Power Infras A
Price$11.10
Change+$0.11 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets223.4M
NYLI CBRE Global Infrastructure Class R6
Price$14.93
Change+$0.14 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.37B
ECOAX vs VCRQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECOAX vs. VCRQX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECOAX is a Hold and VCRQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VCRQX has more cash in the bank: 1.37B vs. ECOAX (223M). ECOAX pays higher dividends than VCRQX: ECOAX (3.55) vs VCRQX (2.07). ECOAX was incepted earlier than VCRQX: ECOAX (5 years) vs VCRQX (6 years). ECOAX (1.20) is less costly to investors than VCRQX (0.92). VCRQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. ECOAX (47.00). VCRQX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECOAX: VCRQX (0) vs ECOAX (2500). ECOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.19 vs. VCRQX (10.67). VCRQX return over 5 years is better than : 50.93 vs. ECOAX (24.32).
| ECOAX | VCRQX | ECOAX / VCRQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.92 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.92 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.077 | 16.218 | 173% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 223M | 1.37B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.55 | 2.07 | 171% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.19 | 10.67 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.01 | 35.39 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.32 | 50.93 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement