It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ECPG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGHI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ECPG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GHI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ECPG (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +2.76% price change this week, while GHI (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -9.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +5.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.19%.
ECPG is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.
GHI is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).
ECPG | GHI | ECPG / GHI | |
Capitalization | 1.07B | 373M | 288% |
EBITDA | 47.7M | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -3.862 | -28.771 | 13% |
P/E Ratio | 113.64 | 7.81 | 1,455% |
Revenue | 1.22B | 76.3M | 1,603% |
Total Cash | 158M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 3.32B | 1.05B | 316% |
ECPG | GHI | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 85 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GHI's Valuation (3) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is significantly better than the same rating for ECPG (77) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that GHI’s stock grew significantly faster than ECPG’s over the last 12 months.
ECPG's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GHI (100) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that ECPG’s stock grew somewhat faster than GHI’s over the last 12 months.
GHI's SMR Rating (88) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is in the same range as ECPG (93) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that GHI’s stock grew similarly to ECPG’s over the last 12 months.
ECPG's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GHI (85) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that ECPG’s stock grew somewhat faster than GHI’s over the last 12 months.
ECPG's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as GHI (13) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that ECPG’s stock grew similarly to GHI’s over the last 12 months.
ECPG | GHI | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 1 day ago80% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago59% | 1 day ago60% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago43% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago46% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago53% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago55% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago69% | 20 days ago51% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago51% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago72% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago57% | 1 day ago57% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECPG has been closely correlated with PRAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECPG jumps, then PRAA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECPG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ECPG | 100% | -2.44% | ||
PRAA - ECPG | 66% Closely correlated | -2.79% | ||
ENVA - ECPG | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.86% | ||
SLM - ECPG | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.75% | ||
UHAL - ECPG | 49% Loosely correlated | -3.67% | ||
CACC - ECPG | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.85% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that GHI and NNI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GHI and NNI's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GHI | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GHI | 100% | -2.04% | ||
NNI - GHI | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.17% | ||
UHAL - GHI | 24% Poorly correlated | -3.67% | ||
CACC - GHI | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.85% | ||
OCSL - GHI | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.25% | ||
NAVI - GHI | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.78% | ||
More |