ECPG
Price
$40.56
Change
-$1.18 (-2.83%)
Updated
Oct 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
960.51M
28 days until earnings call
PRLPF
Price
$21.14
Change
-$0.82 (-3.73%)
Updated
Sep 30 closing price
Capitalization
821.89M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ECPG vs PRLPF

Header iconECPG vs PRLPF Comparison
Open Charts ECPG vs PRLPFBanner chart's image
Encore Capital Group
Price$40.56
Change-$1.18 (-2.83%)
Volume$5.09K
Capitalization960.51M
PROPEL
Price$21.14
Change-$0.82 (-3.73%)
Volume$4.35K
Capitalization821.89M
ECPG vs PRLPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ECPG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECPG vs. PRLPF commentary
Oct 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECPG is a StrongBuy and PRLPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 02, 2025
Stock price -- (ECPG: $41.74 vs. PRLPF: $21.14)
Brand notoriety: ECPG and PRLPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECPG: 112% vs. PRLPF: 110%
Market capitalization -- ECPG: $960.51M vs. PRLPF: $818.99M
ECPG [@Savings Banks] is valued at $960.51M. PRLPF’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $818.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $675.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECPG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePRLPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ECPG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PRLPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ECPG is a better buy in the long-term than PRLPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECPG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRLPF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ECPG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PRLPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PRLPF is a better buy in the short-term than ECPG.

Price Growth

ECPG (@Savings Banks) experienced а -7.88% price change this week, while PRLPF (@Savings Banks) price change was -8.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +47.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

ECPG is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-2.13% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECPG($961M) has a higher market cap than PRLPF($822M). ECPG (-12.623) and PRLPF (-12.825) have similar YTD gains . PRLPF has less debt than ECPG: PRLPF (290M) vs ECPG (3.97B). ECPG has higher revenues than PRLPF: ECPG (1.47B) vs PRLPF (494M).
ECPGPRLPFECPG / PRLPF
Capitalization961M822M117%
EBITDA266MN/A-
Gain YTD-12.623-12.82598%
P/E RatioN/A14.28-
Revenue1.47B494M297%
Total Cash173MN/A-
Total Debt3.97B290M1,367%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ECPG: Fundamental Ratings
ECPG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECPGPRLPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ECPG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NSRIX26.25N/A
N/A
Northern World Selection Index I
NWHOX31.75N/A
N/A
Nationwide Bailard Tech & Sci A
WCFEX18.58N/A
N/A
WCM Focused Emerging Mkts Ex Chn Inv
BMRRX35.74N/A
N/A
BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity R
CAPRX9.24N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Capital Income R

ECPG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECPG has been loosely correlated with PRAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ECPG jumps, then PRAA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECPG
1D Price
Change %
ECPG100%
-4.29%
PRAA - ECPG
59%
Loosely correlated
-3.38%
OMF - ECPG
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.00%
ALLY - ECPG
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.66%
AXP - ECPG
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.97%
ENVA - ECPG
51%
Loosely correlated
-5.63%
More

PRLPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PRLPF and ECPG have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PRLPF and ECPG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRLPF
1D Price
Change %
PRLPF100%
-3.72%
ECPG - PRLPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.29%
SEZL - PRLPF
18%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
VSTS - PRLPF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.49%
DWAY - PRLPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MWG - PRLPF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.51%
More