ECRAF
Price
$0.86
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
378.48M
NBMFF
Price
$0.37
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
28.25M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ECRAF vs NBMFF

Header iconECRAF vs NBMFF Comparison
Open Charts ECRAF vs NBMFFBanner chart's image
ECORA RESOURCES
Price$0.86
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$15.57K
Capitalization378.48M
NEO Battery Materials
Price$0.37
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$18.11K
Capitalization28.25M
ECRAF vs NBMFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ECRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECRAF vs. NBMFF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECRAF is a Hold and NBMFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (ECRAF: $0.86 vs. NBMFF: $0.37)
Brand notoriety: ECRAF and NBMFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECRAF: 87% vs. NBMFF: 294%
Market capitalization -- ECRAF: $378.48M vs. NBMFF: $28.25M
ECRAF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $378.48M. NBMFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $28.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECRAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNBMFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ECRAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NBMFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ECRAF is a better buy in the long-term than NBMFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECRAF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NBMFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ECRAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NBMFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NBMFF is a better buy in the short-term than ECRAF.

Price Growth

ECRAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -2.15% price change this week, while NBMFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -7.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECRAF($378M) has a higher market cap than NBMFF($28.2M). ECRAF YTD gains are higher at: 2.454 vs. NBMFF (-32.727). ECRAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 149M vs. NBMFF (-1.95M). ECRAF has more cash in the bank: 5.72M vs. NBMFF (1.09M). NBMFF has less debt than ECRAF: NBMFF (0) vs ECRAF (45.6M). ECRAF has higher revenues than NBMFF: ECRAF (142M) vs NBMFF (0).
ECRAFNBMFFECRAF / NBMFF
Capitalization378M28.2M1,340%
EBITDA149M-1.95M-7,659%
Gain YTD2.454-32.727-7%
P/E Ratio3.72N/A-
Revenue142M0-
Total Cash5.72M1.09M525%
Total Debt45.6M0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ECRAF vs NBMFF: Fundamental Ratings
ECRAF
NBMFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6228
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10070
SMR RATING
1..100
9099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5239
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ECRAF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NBMFF (88). This means that ECRAF’s stock grew significantly faster than NBMFF’s over the last 12 months.

NBMFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as ECRAF (100). This means that NBMFF’s stock grew similarly to ECRAF’s over the last 12 months.

ECRAF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as NBMFF (99). This means that ECRAF’s stock grew similarly to NBMFF’s over the last 12 months.

NBMFF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as ECRAF (52). This means that NBMFF’s stock grew similarly to ECRAF’s over the last 12 months.

NBMFF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ECRAF (100). This means that NBMFF’s stock grew similarly to ECRAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECRAFNBMFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ECRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CNZLX11.96N/A
N/A
Commonwealth Australia/New Zealand
PNOCX86.02N/A
N/A
Putnam Sustainable Leaders C
SAMVX11.83N/A
N/A
Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity A
BTBFX63.40N/A
N/A
Boston Trust Asset Management
SSIQX13.38N/A
N/A
State Street International Stock Sel K

ECRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ECRAF and TMQ have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECRAF and TMQ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECRAF
1D Price
Change %
ECRAF100%
N/A
TMQ - ECRAF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.17%
SGML - ECRAF
23%
Poorly correlated
+7.90%
RIO - ECRAF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
UURAF - ECRAF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
IPMLF - ECRAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
More

NBMFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NBMFF and ASHXF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBMFF and ASHXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBMFF
1D Price
Change %
NBMFF100%
N/A
ASHXF - NBMFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VLTLF - NBMFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.93%
ECRAF - NBMFF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUMC - NBMFF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OMHLF - NBMFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More