Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECRAX vs JNBZX
ECRAX vs JNBZX Comparison
Open Charts ECRAX vs JNBZX
Eaton Vance All Asset Strategy C
Price$15.24
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets253.87M
JPMorgan Income Builder R6
Price$10.37
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.39B
ECRAX vs JNBZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECRAX vs. JNBZX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECRAX is a Hold and JNBZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNBZX has more cash in the bank: 8.39B vs. ECRAX (254M). JNBZX pays higher dividends than ECRAX: JNBZX (5.64) vs ECRAX (1.11). ECRAX was incepted earlier than JNBZX: ECRAX (14 years) vs JNBZX (8 years). ECRAX (1.99) is less costly to investors than JNBZX (0.57). JNBZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. ECRAX (49.00). ECRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNBZX: ECRAX (1000) vs JNBZX (15000000). JNBZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.95 vs. ECRAX (7.44). JNBZX return over 5 years is better than : 20.95 vs. ECRAX (4.47).
| ECRAX | JNBZX | ECRAX / JNBZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.52 | 362% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.57 | 349% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.482 | 11.037 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 15000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 254M | 8.39B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 5.64 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.44 | 9.95 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.14 | 31.16 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.47 | 20.95 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers