Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECRAX vs JNBZX
ECRAX vs JNBZX Comparison
Open Charts ECRAX vs JNBZX
Eaton Vance All Asset Strategy C
Price$15.32
Change-$0.05 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets257.52M
JPMorgan Income Builder R6
Price$10.41
Change-$0.03 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.44B
ECRAX vs JNBZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECRAX vs. JNBZX commentary
Oct 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECRAX is a Hold and JNBZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNBZX has more cash in the bank: 8.44B vs. ECRAX (258M). JNBZX pays higher dividends than ECRAX: JNBZX (5.70) vs ECRAX (1.13). ECRAX was incepted earlier than JNBZX: ECRAX (14 years) vs JNBZX (8 years). ECRAX (2.11) is less costly to investors than JNBZX (0.57). JNBZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. ECRAX (49.00). ECRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNBZX: ECRAX (1000) vs JNBZX (15000000). JNBZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.02 vs. ECRAX (7.89). JNBZX return over 5 years is better than : 25.06 vs. ECRAX (7.15).
| ECRAX | JNBZX | ECRAX / JNBZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.52 | 406% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.57 | 370% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.551 | 11.033 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 15000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 258M | 8.44B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 5.70 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.89 | 9.02 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.31 | 38.82 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.15 | 25.06 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers