ECRFF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
48.13M
ECRTF
Price
$1.60
Change
+$0.01 (+0.63%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
436.43M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ECRFF vs ECRTF

Header iconECRFF vs ECRTF Comparison
Open Charts ECRFF vs ECRTFBanner chart's image
Cartier Resources
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$11.94K
Capitalization48.13M
Atex Resources
Price$1.60
Change+$0.01 (+0.63%)
Volume$32.2K
Capitalization436.43M
ECRFF vs ECRTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ECRFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ECRTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECRFF vs. ECRTF commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECRFF is a Hold and ECRTF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (ECRFF: $0.11 vs. ECRTF: $1.56)
Brand notoriety: ECRFF and ECRTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECRFF: 103% vs. ECRTF: 245%
Market capitalization -- ECRFF: $48.13M vs. ECRTF: $436.43M
ECRFF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $48.13M. ECRTF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $436.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $79.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECRFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileECRTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ECRFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ECRTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ECRFF and ECRTF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECRFF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ECRTF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ECRFF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ECRTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ECRFF is a better buy in the short-term than ECRTF.

Price Growth

ECRFF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -0.45% price change this week, while ECRTF (@Precious Metals) price change was +9.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5323.16%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.84% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECRTF($436M) has a higher market cap than ECRFF($48.1M). ECRFF YTD gains are higher at: 71.094 vs. ECRTF (24.872). ECRFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -11.38M vs. ECRTF (-54.21M). ECRTF has more cash in the bank: 44.6M vs. ECRFF (714K). ECRFF has less debt than ECRTF: ECRFF (74.1K) vs ECRTF (324K). ECRFF (0) and ECRTF (0) have equivalent revenues.
ECRFFECRTFECRFF / ECRTF
Capitalization48.1M436M11%
EBITDA-11.38M-54.21M21%
Gain YTD71.09424.872286%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash714K44.6M2%
Total Debt74.1K324K23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ECRFF vs ECRTF: Fundamental Ratings
ECRFF
ECRTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
930
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10026
SMR RATING
1..100
96100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3745
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ECRFF's Valuation (42) in the null industry is in the same range as ECRTF (73). This means that ECRFF’s stock grew similarly to ECRTF’s over the last 12 months.

ECRTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ECRFF (100). This means that ECRTF’s stock grew significantly faster than ECRFF’s over the last 12 months.

ECRFF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as ECRTF (100). This means that ECRFF’s stock grew similarly to ECRTF’s over the last 12 months.

ECRFF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as ECRTF (45). This means that ECRFF’s stock grew similarly to ECRTF’s over the last 12 months.

ECRFF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ECRTF (100). This means that ECRFF’s stock grew similarly to ECRTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECRFFECRTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ECRFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ECRTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IVEVF2.28N/A
N/A
INVENTIVA SA
KMSWF0.05N/A
N/A
Kingmaker Footwear Holdings
SGGKF7.18N/A
N/A
Singapore Technologies Engineering Ltd.
PNYG0.25N/A
N/A
PONY GROUP INC.
CEHCF30.00N/A
N/A
Cosmo Energy Hldgs Co Ltd

ECRFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ECRFF and LVXFF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECRFF and LVXFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECRFF
1D Price
Change %
ECRFF100%
-3.86%
LVXFF - ECRFF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUST - ECRFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
DPMLF - ECRFF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.66%
ECRTF - ECRFF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.44%