Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECSCX vs HULFX
ECSCX vs HULFX Comparison
Open Charts ECSCX vs HULFX
Eaton Vance SC Municipal Income C
Price$9.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.2M
Hawaiian Tax-Free Trust F
Price$10.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets383.8M
ECSCX vs HULFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECSCX vs. HULFX commentary
Oct 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECSCX is a Hold and HULFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HULFX has more cash in the bank: 384M vs. ECSCX (198M). HULFX (2.57) and ECSCX (2.54) have matching dividends . ECSCX was incepted earlier than HULFX: ECSCX (20 years) vs HULFX (7 years). ECSCX (1.46) is less costly to investors than HULFX (0.76). ECSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. HULFX (18.00). HULFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECSCX: HULFX (0) vs ECSCX (1000). HULFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.54 vs. ECSCX (0.70). HULFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.76 vs. ECSCX (-2.37).
| ECSCX | HULFX | ECSCX / HULFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.76 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.76 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.094 | 3.041 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 198M | 384M | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.54 | 2.57 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.70 | 2.54 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.46 | 10.33 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.37 | 1.76 | -135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.24 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement