Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECSMX vs WCMLX
ECSMX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts ECSMX vs WCMLX
Eaton Vance Small-Cap C
Price$10.12
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.81M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.15
Change+$0.06 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.26M
ECSMX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECSMX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECSMX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECSMX has more cash in the bank: 155M vs. WCMLX (41.3M). ECSMX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECSMX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: ECSMX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). ECSMX (2.11) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. ECSMX (38.00). ECSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: ECSMX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.04 vs. ECSMX (-16.41). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.83 vs. ECSMX (-5.50).
| ECSMX | WCMLX | ECSMX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.99 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 1.79 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.503 | 1.788 | -587% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 155M | 41.3M | 375% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.41 | -3.04 | 540% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.98 | 21.43 | -5% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.50 | -0.83 | 660% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.84 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement