Ad is loading...
ECSMX vs WCMLX
ECSMX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts ECSMX vs WCMLX
Eaton Vance Small-Cap C
Price$10.19
Change+$0.12 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets176.63M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$10.78
Change+$0.16 (+1.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.46M
ECSMX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECSMX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECSMX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECSMX has more cash in the bank: 177M vs. WCMLX (38.5M). ECSMX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECSMX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: ECSMX (23 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). ECSMX (2.13) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.86). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. ECSMX (42.00). ECSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: ECSMX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). ECSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.50 vs. WCMLX (-17.03). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 24.50 vs. ECSMX (18.19).
| ECSMX | WCMLX | ECSMX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.99 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 1.86 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.121 | -17.418 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 177M | 38.5M | 460% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.50 | -17.03 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.19 | -9.46 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.19 | 24.50 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | -33.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers