Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECSMX vs WCMLX
ECSMX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts ECSMX vs WCMLX
Eaton Vance Small-Cap C
Price$11.32
Change-$0.07 (-0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets179.69M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.69
Change+$0.08 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.77M
ECSMX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECSMX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECSMX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECSMX has more cash in the bank: 180M vs. WCMLX (44.8M). ECSMX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECSMX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: ECSMX (23 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). ECSMX (2.11) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. ECSMX (38.00). ECSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: ECSMX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.77 vs. ECSMX (-0.35). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 17.13 vs. ECSMX (14.24).
| ECSMX | WCMLX | ECSMX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.99 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 1.79 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.530 | 5.832 | 9% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 180M | 44.8M | 402% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.35 | 4.77 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.22 | 22.83 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.24 | 17.13 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.79 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement