ECTM
Price
$0.50
Change
+$0.01 (+2.04%)
Updated
Apr 23 closing price
Capitalization
17.96M
GLPEF
Price
$15.53
Change
+$1.20 (+8.37%)
Updated
Apr 23 closing price
Capitalization
10.87B
Ad is loading...

ECTM vs GLPEF

Header iconECTM vs GLPEF Comparison
Open Charts ECTM vs GLPEFBanner chart's image
ECA Marcellus Trust I
Price$0.50
Change+$0.01 (+2.04%)
Volume$1.6K
Capitalization17.96M
Galp Energia, SA
Price$15.53
Change+$1.20 (+8.37%)
Volume$1.24K
Capitalization10.87B
ECTM vs GLPEF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ECTM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECTM vs. GLPEF commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECTM is a Hold and GLPEF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (ECTM: $0.50 vs. GLPEF: $15.53)
Brand notoriety: ECTM and GLPEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECTM: 4% vs. GLPEF: 62%
Market capitalization -- ECTM: $17.96M vs. GLPEF: $10.87B
ECTM [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $17.96M. GLPEF’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $10.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $461.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $63.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECTM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGLPEF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ECTM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GLPEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ECTM is a better buy in the long-term than GLPEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECTM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ECTM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

ECTM (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -0.54% price change this week, while GLPEF (@Integrated Oil) price change was +3.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

ECTM is expected to report earnings on Mar 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (+2.38% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPEF($10.9B) has a higher market cap than ECTM($18M). GLPEF has higher P/E ratio than ECTM: GLPEF (5.12) vs ECTM (1.95). ECTM YTD gains are higher at: 5.894 vs. GLPEF (-10.747). GLPEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.1B vs. ECTM (9.25M). GLPEF has more cash in the bank: 2.23B vs. ECTM (2.07M). GLPEF has higher revenues than ECTM: GLPEF (26.3B) vs ECTM (10.7M).
ECTMGLPEFECTM / GLPEF
Capitalization18M10.9B0%
EBITDA9.25M5.1B0%
Gain YTD5.894-10.747-55%
P/E Ratio1.955.1238%
Revenue10.7M26.3B0%
Total Cash2.07M2.23B0%
Total DebtN/A4.69B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ECTM vs GLPEF: Fundamental Ratings
ECTM
GLPEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8034
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8160
SMR RATING
1..100
7941
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4682
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
870
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ECTM's Valuation (14) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as GLPEF (40) in the null industry. This means that ECTM’s stock grew similarly to GLPEF’s over the last 12 months.

GLPEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as ECTM (81) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that GLPEF’s stock grew similarly to ECTM’s over the last 12 months.

GLPEF's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECTM (79) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that GLPEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECTM’s over the last 12 months.

ECTM's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLPEF (82) in the null industry. This means that ECTM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLPEF’s over the last 12 months.

ECTM's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLPEF (70) in the null industry. This means that ECTM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLPEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECTM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ECTM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HIVE1.680.08
+5.00%
HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd
ATRA6.900.16
+2.37%
Atara Biotherapeutics Inc.
ADSK264.443.30
+1.26%
Autodesk
DMLP29.330.13
+0.45%
Dorchester Minerals LP
HR15.72-0.06
-0.38%
Healthcare Realty Trust

ECTM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ECTM and EQNR have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECTM and EQNR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECTM
1D Price
Change %
ECTM100%
+1.00%
EQNR - ECTM
15%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
E - ECTM
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
GLPEF - ECTM
4%
Poorly correlated
+8.37%
EC - ECTM
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
SLNG - ECTM
1%
Poorly correlated
+10.45%
More

GLPEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLPEF and E have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLPEF and E's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLPEF
1D Price
Change %
GLPEF100%
+8.37%
E - GLPEF
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
NFG - GLPEF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
EC - GLPEF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
EQNR - GLPEF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
EIPAF - GLPEF
5%
Poorly correlated
+15.11%
More