ECTM
Price
$0.63
Change
+$0.01 (+1.61%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
17.96M
GLPEF
Price
$18.10
Change
-$0.93 (-4.89%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
10.87B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ECTM vs GLPEF

Header iconECTM vs GLPEF Comparison
Open Charts ECTM vs GLPEFBanner chart's image
ECA Marcellus Trust I
Price$0.63
Change+$0.01 (+1.61%)
Volume$1.43K
Capitalization17.96M
Galp Energia, SA
Price$18.10
Change-$0.93 (-4.89%)
Volume$125
Capitalization10.87B
ECTM vs GLPEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ECTM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLPEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECTM vs. GLPEF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECTM is a Hold and GLPEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ECTM: $0.63 vs. GLPEF: $18.10)
Brand notoriety: ECTM and GLPEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECTM: 4% vs. GLPEF: 7%
Market capitalization -- ECTM: $17.96M vs. GLPEF: $10.87B
ECTM [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $17.96M. GLPEF’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $10.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $461.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $63.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECTM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGLPEF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ECTM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GLPEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLPEF is a better buy in the long-term than ECTM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECTM’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLPEF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ECTM’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GLPEF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLPEF is a better buy in the short-term than ECTM.

Price Growth

ECTM (@Integrated Oil) experienced а +0.94% price change this week, while GLPEF (@Integrated Oil) price change was +0.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +4.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

ECTM is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (+4.36% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPEF($10.9B) has a higher market cap than ECTM($18M). GLPEF has higher P/E ratio than ECTM: GLPEF (5.12) vs ECTM (1.95). ECTM YTD gains are higher at: 46.883 vs. GLPEF (4.023). GLPEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.1B vs. ECTM (9.25M). GLPEF has more cash in the bank: 2.23B vs. ECTM (2.07M). GLPEF has higher revenues than ECTM: GLPEF (26.3B) vs ECTM (10.7M).
ECTMGLPEFECTM / GLPEF
Capitalization18M10.9B0%
EBITDA9.25M5.1B0%
Gain YTD46.8834.0231,165%
P/E Ratio1.955.1238%
Revenue10.7M26.3B0%
Total Cash2.07M2.23B0%
Total DebtN/A4.69B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ECTM vs GLPEF: Fundamental Ratings
ECTM
GLPEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8166
SMR RATING
1..100
6942
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4054
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6569
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ECTM's Valuation (3) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLPEF (38) in the null industry. This means that ECTM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLPEF’s over the last 12 months.

GLPEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as ECTM (81) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that GLPEF’s stock grew similarly to ECTM’s over the last 12 months.

GLPEF's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as ECTM (69) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that GLPEF’s stock grew similarly to ECTM’s over the last 12 months.

ECTM's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as GLPEF (54) in the null industry. This means that ECTM’s stock grew similarly to GLPEF’s over the last 12 months.

ECTM's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as GLPEF (69) in the null industry. This means that ECTM’s stock grew similarly to GLPEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECTMGLPEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
83%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ECTM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLPEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BGJTF9.92N/A
N/A
Baillie Gifford Japan Trust Plc. (The)
FDT68.88-0.03
-0.04%
First Trust Dev Mkts Ex-US AlphaDEX® ETF
LMBS49.20-0.04
-0.08%
First Trust Low Duration Oppos ETF
TOLZ53.29-0.04
-0.08%
ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infras
MCSE14.44-0.01
-0.10%
Franklin Sustainable Intl Eq ETF

ECTM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ECTM and EQNR have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECTM and EQNR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECTM
1D Price
Change %
ECTM100%
+1.28%
EQNR - ECTM
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
E - ECTM
14%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
GLPEF - ECTM
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.91%
EC - ECTM
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLNG - ECTM
1%
Poorly correlated
-11.42%
More

GLPEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLPEF and E have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLPEF and E's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLPEF
1D Price
Change %
GLPEF100%
-4.91%
E - GLPEF
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
NFG - GLPEF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
EC - GLPEF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EQNR - GLPEF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
EIPAF - GLPEF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
More