ECTM
Price
$0.59
Change
-$0.01 (-1.67%)
Updated
Jul 28 closing price
Capitalization
17.96M
SLNG
Price
$4.88
Change
+$0.09 (+1.88%)
Updated
Jul 29, 12:20 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
77.87M
8 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ECTM vs SLNG

Header iconECTM vs SLNG Comparison
Open Charts ECTM vs SLNGBanner chart's image
ECA Marcellus Trust I
Price$0.59
Change-$0.01 (-1.67%)
Volume$13.84K
Capitalization17.96M
Stabilis Solutions
Price$4.88
Change+$0.09 (+1.88%)
Volume$100
Capitalization77.87M
ECTM vs SLNG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ECTM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLNG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECTM vs. SLNG commentary
Jul 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECTM is a Hold and SLNG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 29, 2025
Stock price -- (ECTM: $0.59 vs. SLNG: $4.79)
Brand notoriety: ECTM and SLNG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECTM: 46% vs. SLNG: 70%
Market capitalization -- ECTM: $17.96M vs. SLNG: $77.87M
ECTM [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $17.96M. SLNG’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $77.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $461.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $63.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECTM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLNG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ECTM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLNG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ECTM is a better buy in the long-term than SLNG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECTM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLNG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ECTM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SLNG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ECTM is a better buy in the short-term than SLNG.

Price Growth

ECTM (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -9.17% price change this week, while SLNG (@Integrated Oil) price change was -5.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

ECTM is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

SLNG is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (+1.17% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLNG($77.9M) has a higher market cap than ECTM($18M). SLNG has higher P/E ratio than ECTM: SLNG (419.00) vs ECTM (1.95). ECTM YTD gains are higher at: 38.030 vs. SLNG (-10.415). ECTM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.25M vs. SLNG (8.58M). SLNG has more cash in the bank: 5.37M vs. ECTM (2.07M). SLNG has higher revenues than ECTM: SLNG (73.1M) vs ECTM (10.7M).
ECTMSLNGECTM / SLNG
Capitalization18M77.9M23%
EBITDA9.25M8.58M108%
Gain YTD38.030-10.415-365%
P/E Ratio1.95419.000%
Revenue10.7M73.1M15%
Total Cash2.07M5.37M39%
Total DebtN/A9.61M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ECTM vs SLNG: Fundamental Ratings
ECTM
SLNG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5266
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8173
SMR RATING
1..100
6987
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4464
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6896
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ECTM's Valuation (5) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLNG (85) in the null industry. This means that ECTM’s stock grew significantly faster than SLNG’s over the last 12 months.

SLNG's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as ECTM (81) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that SLNG’s stock grew similarly to ECTM’s over the last 12 months.

ECTM's SMR Rating (69) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as SLNG (87) in the null industry. This means that ECTM’s stock grew similarly to SLNG’s over the last 12 months.

ECTM's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as SLNG (64) in the null industry. This means that ECTM’s stock grew similarly to SLNG’s over the last 12 months.

ECTM's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as SLNG (96) in the null industry. This means that ECTM’s stock grew similarly to SLNG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECTMSLNG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ECTM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLNG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NIPOF521.5318.37
+3.65%
Japan Hotel REIT Investment Corp
FNMAP17.000.23
+1.37%
Fannie Mae
DNOPY70.900.40
+0.57%
DINO POLSKA SA
KGAUF0.13N/A
N/A
Kongsberg Automotive ASA
GRCAF0.07-0.01
-10.39%
GOLD SPRINGS RESOURCE CORP.

ECTM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ECTM and EQNR have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECTM and EQNR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECTM
1D Price
Change %
ECTM100%
-1.15%
EQNR - ECTM
15%
Poorly correlated
+2.84%
E - ECTM
14%
Poorly correlated
-1.12%
GLPEF - ECTM
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EC - ECTM
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
SLNG - ECTM
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
More

SLNG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLNG and PBR have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLNG and PBR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLNG
1D Price
Change %
SLNG100%
+1.54%
PBR - SLNG
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
IMO - SLNG
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.45%
E - SLNG
17%
Poorly correlated
-1.12%
BP - SLNG
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.46%
TTE - SLNG
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
More