ECTXF
Price
$6.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
EMFGF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Ad is loading...

ECTXF vs EMFGF

Header iconECTXF vs EMFGF Comparison
Open Charts ECTXF vs EMFGFBanner chart's image
ELECTROLUX PROFESSIONAL AB
Price$6.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.98K
CapitalizationN/A
Fluence
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$443
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
ECTXF vs EMFGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
ECTXF vs. EMFGF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECTXF is a Hold and EMFGF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (ECTXF: $6.11 vs. EMFGF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: ECTXF and EMFGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECTXF: 166% vs. EMFGF: 74%
Market capitalization -- ECTXF: $1.62B vs. EMFGF: $51.84M
ECTXF [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $1.62B. EMFGF’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $51.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $135.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $9.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECTXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEMFGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ECTXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EMFGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ECTXF is a better buy in the long-term than EMFGF.

Price Growth

ECTXF (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while EMFGF (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -50.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (-0.35% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECTXF($1.62B) has a higher market cap than EMFGF($51.8M). ECTXF YTD gains are higher at: 12.316 vs. EMFGF (-22.857). ECTXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.71B vs. EMFGF (-13.85M). ECTXF has more cash in the bank: 710M vs. EMFGF (40.8M). EMFGF has less debt than ECTXF: EMFGF (37.2M) vs ECTXF (2.68B). ECTXF has higher revenues than EMFGF: ECTXF (11.9B) vs EMFGF (90.3M).
ECTXFEMFGFECTXF / EMFGF
Capitalization1.62B51.8M3,122%
EBITDA1.71B-13.85M-12,333%
Gain YTD12.316-22.857-54%
P/E Ratio21.32N/A-
Revenue11.9B90.3M13,178%
Total Cash710M40.8M1,740%
Total Debt2.68B37.2M7,215%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMFGF: Fundamental Ratings
EMFGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
95
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME21.660.39
+1.83%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X67612.720000571.609400
+0.85%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA221.331.76
+0.80%
Tesla
SPY582.302.52
+0.43%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL231.78-2.07
-0.89%
Apple

ECTXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ECTXF and CHNR have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECTXF and CHNR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECTXF
1D Price
Change %
ECTXF100%
N/A
CHNR - ECTXF
32%
Poorly correlated
+7.32%
THKLY - ECTXF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
EBCOY - ECTXF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
EMFGF - ECTXF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FANUY - ECTXF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
More

EMFGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMFGF and AFGVF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMFGF and AFGVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMFGF
1D Price
Change %
EMFGF100%
N/A
AFGVF - EMFGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EBCOY - EMFGF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
ECTXF - EMFGF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FANUY - EMFGF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
FANUF - EMFGF
4%
Poorly correlated
-14.72%
More