Advertisement
EDAP vs SENS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDAP is a Buy and SENS is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EDAP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSENS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- EDAP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SENS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EDAP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SENS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EDAP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SENS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
EDAP (@Medical Distributors) experienced а +0.88% price change this week, while SENS (@Medical Specialties) price change was -1.07% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Distributors industry was +3.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.43%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.02%.
Reported Earning Dates
EDAP is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2025.
SENS is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical Distributors (+3.31% weekly)Healthcare distribution market can be segmented into pharmaceutical product distribution services, medical device distribution services, and biopharmaceutical product distribution services. In addition to serving as intermediaries, many medical distributors also purchase and take legal ownership of pharmaceuticals and manage inventory and credit risk. According to a Deloitte report, pharmaceutical distributors’ core services of efficient product distribution, inventory management, financial risk management, and information-sharing generate $33 billion-$53 billion in value annually to the U.S. health care ecosystem. Some prominent players in the overall medical distribution industry include McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and Patterson Companies, Inc.
@Medical Specialties (+0.93% weekly)Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.
| EDAP | SENS | EDAP / SENS | |
| Capitalization | 282M | 282M | 100% |
| EBITDA | -18.39M | -48.01M | 38% |
| Gain YTD | -22.398 | -4.471 | 501% |
| P/E Ratio | 100.00 | 8.58 | 1,165% |
| Revenue | 60.4M | 22.4M | 270% |
| Total Cash | 43.5M | 109M | 40% |
| Total Debt | 8.42M | 47.8M | 18% |
EDAP | SENS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 5 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 99 Overvalued | 59 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 98 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 29 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SENS's Valuation (59) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EDAP (99) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that SENS’s stock grew somewhat faster than EDAP’s over the last 12 months.
SENS's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as EDAP (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that SENS’s stock grew similarly to EDAP’s over the last 12 months.
EDAP's SMR Rating (97) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as SENS (100) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that EDAP’s stock grew similarly to SENS’s over the last 12 months.
SENS's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as EDAP (85) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that SENS’s stock grew similarly to EDAP’s over the last 12 months.
SENS's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for EDAP (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that SENS’s stock grew significantly faster than EDAP’s over the last 12 months.
| EDAP | SENS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 7 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 1 day ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 86% |
Advertisement
EDAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EDAP and AORT have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EDAP and AORT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EDAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDAP | 100% | -3.11% | ||
| AORT - EDAP | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
| AVNS - EDAP | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.81% | ||
| SRDX - EDAP | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.62% | ||
| UFPT - EDAP | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.21% | ||
| SENS - EDAP | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
More | ||||
SENS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SENS and ARAY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SENS and ARAY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SENS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SENS | 100% | -0.28% | ||
| ARAY - SENS | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.49% | ||
| NAOV - SENS | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.07% | ||
| ICCM - SENS | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.49% | ||
| GMED - SENS | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.08% | ||
| OSUR - SENS | 27% Poorly correlated | +5.23% | ||
More | ||||