It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EDAP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSRDX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EDAP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRDX’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
EDAP (@Medical Distributors) experienced а -0.79% price change this week, while SRDX (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +6.65% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Distributors industry was -1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.71%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -2.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.03%.
EDAP is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.
SRDX is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
Healthcare distribution market can be segmented into pharmaceutical product distribution services, medical device distribution services, and biopharmaceutical product distribution services. In addition to serving as intermediaries, many medical distributors also purchase and take legal ownership of pharmaceuticals and manage inventory and credit risk. According to a Deloitte report, pharmaceutical distributors’ core services of efficient product distribution, inventory management, financial risk management, and information-sharing generate $33 billion-$53 billion in value annually to the U.S. health care ecosystem. Some prominent players in the overall medical distribution industry include McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and Patterson Companies, Inc.
@Medical/Nursing Services (-2.28% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
EDAP | SRDX | EDAP / SRDX | |
Capitalization | 47.1M | 543M | 9% |
EBITDA | -19.67M | -2.59M | 760% |
Gain YTD | -42.986 | -4.040 | 1,064% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 43.23 | - |
Revenue | 62.8M | 122M | 51% |
Total Cash | 22.8M | 31.1M | 73% |
Total Debt | 9.08M | 32.8M | 28% |
EDAP | SRDX | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 83 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SRDX's Valuation (93) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as EDAP (98) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that SRDX’s stock grew similarly to EDAP’s over the last 12 months.
SRDX's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as EDAP (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that SRDX’s stock grew similarly to EDAP’s over the last 12 months.
SRDX's SMR Rating (95) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as EDAP (97) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that SRDX’s stock grew similarly to EDAP’s over the last 12 months.
SRDX's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EDAP (94) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that SRDX’s stock grew somewhat faster than EDAP’s over the last 12 months.
SRDX's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as EDAP (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that SRDX’s stock grew similarly to EDAP’s over the last 12 months.
EDAP | SRDX | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 1 day ago68% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago66% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago85% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 1 day ago79% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 1 day ago68% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago85% | 1 day ago68% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago67% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago82% | 6 days ago69% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago89% | 1 day ago65% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that EDAP and AORT have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EDAP and AORT's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EDAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EDAP | 100% | +1.53% | ||
AORT - EDAP | 29% Poorly correlated | +4.91% | ||
AVNS - EDAP | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.77% | ||
SRDX - EDAP | 21% Poorly correlated | +7.31% | ||
UFPT - EDAP | 20% Poorly correlated | +3.56% | ||
SENS - EDAP | 20% Poorly correlated | -5.85% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that SRDX and BDX have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRDX and BDX's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SRDX | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SRDX | 100% | +7.31% | ||
BDX - SRDX | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.52% | ||
ALGN - SRDX | 31% Poorly correlated | -3.52% | ||
BLCO - SRDX | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
UFPT - SRDX | 28% Poorly correlated | +3.56% | ||
ATRC - SRDX | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.51% | ||
More |