EDBL
Price
$1.82
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 29, 03:34 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.32M
UPBMF
Price
$3.51
Change
+$0.80 (+29.52%)
Updated
Mar 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.34B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EDBL vs UPBMF

Header iconEDBL vs UPBMF Comparison
Open Charts EDBL vs UPBMFBanner chart's image
Edible Garden AG
Price$1.82
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization5.32M
United Plantations Berhad
Price$3.51
Change+$0.80 (+29.52%)
Volume$12K
Capitalization3.34B
EDBL vs UPBMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EDBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EDBL vs. UPBMF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDBL is a Hold and UPBMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (EDBL: $1.82 vs. UPBMF: $3.51)
Brand notoriety: EDBL and UPBMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EDBL: 33% vs. UPBMF: 100%
Market capitalization -- EDBL: $5.32M vs. UPBMF: $3.34B
EDBL [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] is valued at $5.32M. UPBMF’s [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] market capitalization is $3.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry ranges from $34.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry is $2.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EDBL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUPBMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EDBL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UPBMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UPBMF is a better buy in the long-term than EDBL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EDBL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • EDBL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

EDBL (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) experienced а -1.09% price change this week, while UPBMF (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+0.96% weekly)

The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UPBMF($3.34B) has a higher market cap than EDBL($5.32M). UPBMF has higher P/E ratio than EDBL: UPBMF (14.09) vs EDBL (0.02). UPBMF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. EDBL (-77.356). UPBMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.07B vs. EDBL (-9.69M). UPBMF has more cash in the bank: 390M vs. EDBL (2.82M). EDBL has less debt than UPBMF: EDBL (2.85M) vs UPBMF (13M). UPBMF has higher revenues than EDBL: UPBMF (2.33B) vs EDBL (12.3M).
EDBLUPBMFEDBL / UPBMF
Capitalization5.32M3.34B0%
EBITDA-9.69M1.07B-1%
Gain YTD-77.3560.000-
P/E Ratio0.0214.090%
Revenue12.3M2.33B1%
Total Cash2.82M390M1%
Total Debt2.85M13M22%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EDBLUPBMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
4%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
4%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EDBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGCIX10.21N/A
N/A
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure C
BKBDX12.86N/A
N/A
BlackRock Global Dividend K
FNSTX16.46N/A
N/A
Fidelity Infrastructure
JUEAX27.23N/A
N/A
JPMorgan US Equity A
JGLYX18.48N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Small Cap Growth R4

EDBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EDBL and MHGVY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EDBL and MHGVY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EDBL
1D Price
Change %
EDBL100%
-0.55%
MHGVY - EDBL
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
ALCO - EDBL
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
DOLE - EDBL
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
CHSCM - EDBL
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
LMNR - EDBL
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
More

UPBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UPBMF and EDBL have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UPBMF and EDBL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UPBMF
1D Price
Change %
UPBMF100%
N/A
EDBL - UPBMF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
DTCK - UPBMF
1%
Poorly correlated
+3.52%
KUBR - UPBMF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
AFRI - UPBMF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
LOCL - UPBMF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.50%