EDDRF
Price
$9.00
Change
-$0.40 (-4.26%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.07B
HWGG
Price
$9.00
Change
+$2.06 (+29.68%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
221.94M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EDDRF vs HWGG

Header iconEDDRF vs HWGG Comparison
Open Charts EDDRF vs HWGGBanner chart's image
EDreams Odigeo SA
Price$9.00
Change-$0.40 (-4.26%)
Volume$69.28K
Capitalization1.07B
HWGG Entertainment
Price$9.00
Change+$2.06 (+29.68%)
Volume$700
Capitalization221.94M
EDDRF vs HWGG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EDDRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWGG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EDDRF vs. HWGG commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDDRF is a Hold and HWGG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (EDDRF: $9.00 vs. HWGG: $9.00)
Brand notoriety: EDDRF and HWGG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Consumer Sundries industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EDDRF: 8% vs. HWGG: 112%
Market capitalization -- EDDRF: $1.07B vs. HWGG: $221.94M
EDDRF [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $1.07B. HWGG’s [@Consumer Sundries] market capitalization is $221.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $178.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EDDRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHWGG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EDDRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HWGG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HWGG is a better buy in the long-term than EDDRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EDDRF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWGG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EDDRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HWGG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HWGG is a better buy in the short-term than EDDRF.

Price Growth

EDDRF (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а -4.26% price change this week, while HWGG (@Consumer Sundries) price change was +350.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +9.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.38%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (+9.70% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EDDRF($1.07B) has a higher market cap than HWGG($222M). HWGG YTD gains are higher at: 202.013 vs. EDDRF (3.824).
EDDRFHWGGEDDRF / HWGG
Capitalization1.07B222M482%
EBITDA116MN/A-
Gain YTD3.824202.0132%
P/E Ratio21.62N/A-
Revenue671MN/A-
Total Cash78.6MN/A-
Total Debt379MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EDDRF vs HWGG: Fundamental Ratings
EDDRF
HWGG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5049
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
51100
SMR RATING
1..100
54100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5834
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
86100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1250

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EDDRF's Valuation (77) in the null industry is in the same range as HWGG (99). This means that EDDRF’s stock grew similarly to HWGG’s over the last 12 months.

EDDRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HWGG (100). This means that EDDRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HWGG’s over the last 12 months.

EDDRF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HWGG (100). This means that EDDRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HWGG’s over the last 12 months.

HWGG's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as EDDRF (58). This means that HWGG’s stock grew similarly to EDDRF’s over the last 12 months.

EDDRF's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as HWGG (100). This means that EDDRF’s stock grew similarly to HWGG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EDDRFHWGG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EDDRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWGG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DHIAX20.250.14
+0.70%
Diamond Hill International Inv
RYWAX55.04-0.03
-0.05%
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth H
JHQDX19.30-0.04
-0.21%
JPMorgan Hedged Equity 2 I
EWMCX40.29-0.25
-0.62%
Evercore Equity
FSLBX194.33-3.67
-1.85%
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Inv Mgmt

EDDRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EDDRF and HWGG have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EDDRF and HWGG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EDDRF
1D Price
Change %
EDDRF100%
N/A
HWGG - EDDRF
7%
Poorly correlated
+29.68%
WW - EDDRF
5%
Poorly correlated
-5.13%
HSWLF - EDDRF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGETF - EDDRF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DRTGF - EDDRF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HWGG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HWGG and EDDRF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HWGG and EDDRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWGG
1D Price
Change %
HWGG100%
+29.68%
EDDRF - HWGG
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DRTGF - HWGG
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGETF - HWGG
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FTDR - HWGG
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
CTMLF - HWGG
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More