Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EDEN vs EWA
EDEN vs EWA Comparison
Open Charts EDEN vs EWA
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
Price$111.74
Change+$1.19 (+1.08%)
Volume$2.63K
Net Assets188M
iShares MSCI Australia ETF
Price$27.11
Change-$0.27 (-0.99%)
Volume$31.51K
Net Assets1.56B
EDEN vs EWA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EDEN vs. EWA commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDEN is a Buy and EWA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWA has more net assets: 1.57B vs. EDEN (188M). EWA has a higher annual dividend yield than EDEN: EWA (15.490) vs EDEN (7.030). EDEN was incepted earlier than EWA: EDEN (14 years) vs EWA (30 years). EWA (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than EDEN (0.53). EDEN has a higher turnover EWA (5.00) vs EWA (5.00).
| EDEN | EWA | EDEN / EWA | |
| Gain YTD | 7.030 | 15.490 | 45% |
| Net Assets | 188M | 1.57B | 12% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.50 | 106% |
| Turnover | 14.00 | 5.00 | 280% |
| Yield | 1.82 | 3.00 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 30 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EDEN | EWA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 7 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 81% | 15 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EDEN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EDEN and GMAB have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EDEN and GMAB's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EDEN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDEN | 100% | +0.51% | ||
| GMAB - EDEN | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.57% | ||
| SIM - EDEN | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CHR - EDEN | 3% Poorly correlated | +3.93% | ||
| STG - EDEN | 2% Poorly correlated | -1.30% | ||
| TOP - EDEN | -1% Poorly correlated | -0.74% | ||
More | ||||
EWA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWA has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWA jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y