Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EDEN vs EWA
EDEN vs EWA Comparison
Open Charts EDEN vs EWA
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
Price$113.63
Change+$0.67 (+0.59%)
Volume$500
Net Assets224.99M
iShares MSCI Australia ETF
Price$26.09
Change-$0.34 (-1.29%)
Volume$20.16K
Net Assets1.58B
EDEN vs EWA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EDEN vs. EWA commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDEN is a Hold and EWA is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWA has more net assets: 1.59B vs. EDEN (225M). EWA has a higher annual dividend yield than EDEN: EWA (12.469) vs EDEN (7.654). EDEN was incepted earlier than EWA: EDEN (13 years) vs EWA (29 years). EWA (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than EDEN (0.53). EDEN has a higher turnover EWA (5.00) vs EWA (5.00).
| EDEN | EWA | EDEN / EWA | |
| Gain YTD | 7.654 | 12.469 | 61% |
| Net Assets | 225M | 1.59B | 14% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.50 | 106% |
| Turnover | 14.00 | 5.00 | 280% |
| Yield | 1.39 | 3.43 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 29 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EDEN | EWA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 81% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EDEN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EDEN has been loosely correlated with GMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EDEN jumps, then GMAB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EDEN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDEN | 100% | +0.67% | ||
| GMAB - EDEN | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| TOP - EDEN | 17% Poorly correlated | -4.28% | ||
| FLS - EDEN | 12% Poorly correlated | +6.77% | ||
| STG - EDEN | 6% Poorly correlated | -1.82% | ||
| SIM - EDEN | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
EWA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWA has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWA jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y