Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EDEN vs EWP
EDEN vs EWP Comparison
Open Charts EDEN vs EWP
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
Price$112.92
Change+$0.25 (+0.22%)
Volume$200
Net Assets196.96M
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
Price$49.32
Change+$0.40 (+0.82%)
Volume$701
Net Assets1.43B
EDEN vs EWP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EDEN vs. EWP commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDEN is a Hold and EWP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWP has more net assets: 1.43B vs. EDEN (197M). EWP has a higher annual dividend yield than EDEN: EWP (60.670) vs EDEN (7.631). EDEN was incepted earlier than EWP: EDEN (14 years) vs EWP (30 years). EWP (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than EDEN (0.53). EWP has a higher turnover EDEN (14.00) vs EDEN (14.00).
| EDEN | EWP | EDEN / EWP | |
| Gain YTD | 7.631 | 60.670 | 13% |
| Net Assets | 197M | 1.43B | 14% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.50 | 106% |
| Turnover | 14.00 | 15.00 | 93% |
| Yield | 1.83 | 2.63 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 30 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EDEN | EWP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 80% | 8 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EDEN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EDEN and GMAB have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EDEN and GMAB's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EDEN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDEN | 100% | +0.24% | ||
| GMAB - EDEN | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.31% | ||
| STG - EDEN | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.37% | ||
| SIM - EDEN | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.92% | ||
| CHR - EDEN | 3% Poorly correlated | +14.29% | ||
| TOP - EDEN | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.78% | ||
More | ||||
EWP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWP has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EWP jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y