Ad is loading...
EDEN vs EWU
EDEN vs EWU Comparison
Open Charts EDEN vs EWU
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
Price$93.26
Change-$0.63 (-0.67%)
Volume$4.05K
Net Assets191.83M
iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF
Price$33.11
Change-$0.08 (-0.24%)
Volume$1.16K
Net Assets2.88B
EDEN vs EWU Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EDEN vs. EWU commentary
Apr 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDEN is a Hold and EWU is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWU has more net assets: 2.88B vs. EDEN (192M). EWU has a higher annual dividend yield than EDEN: EWU (-2.094) vs EDEN (-12.329). EDEN was incepted earlier than EWU: EDEN (13 years) vs EWU (29 years). EWU (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than EDEN (0.53). EDEN has a higher turnover EWU (10.00) vs EWU (10.00).
| EDEN | EWU | EDEN / EWU | |
| Gain YTD | -12.329 | -2.094 | 589% |
| Net Assets | 192M | 2.88B | 7% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.50 | 106% |
| Turnover | 14.00 | 10.00 | 140% |
| Yield | 1.54 | 3.76 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 29 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EDEN | EWU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 81% | 24 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EDEN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EDEN has been loosely correlated with GMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EDEN jumps, then GMAB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EDEN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDEN | 100% | -0.67% | ||
| GMAB - EDEN | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| TOP - EDEN | 19% Poorly correlated | -3.70% | ||
| FLS - EDEN | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.23% | ||
| STG - EDEN | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.10% | ||
| SIM - EDEN | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
EWU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EWU has been loosely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EWU jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y