EDNMF
Price
$30.45
Change
+$0.05 (+0.16%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
7.41B
EHMEF
Price
$146.96
Change
-$0.49 (-0.33%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.44B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EDNMF vs EHMEF

Header iconEDNMF vs EHMEF Comparison
Open Charts EDNMF vs EHMEFBanner chart's image
Edenred Malakoff
Price$30.45
Change+$0.05 (+0.16%)
Volume$222
Capitalization7.41B
GOEASY
Price$146.96
Change-$0.49 (-0.33%)
Volume$11.78K
Capitalization2.44B
EDNMF vs EHMEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EDNMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EHMEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EDNMF vs. EHMEF commentary
Aug 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDNMF is a Hold and EHMEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 27, 2025
Stock price -- (EDNMF: $30.45 vs. EHMEF: $146.96)
Brand notoriety: EDNMF and EHMEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EDNMF: 100% vs. EHMEF: 4%
Market capitalization -- EDNMF: $7.41B vs. EHMEF: $2.44B
EDNMF [@Savings Banks] is valued at $7.41B. EHMEF’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $2.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $681.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EDNMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEHMEF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EDNMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EHMEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EHMEF is a better buy in the long-term than EDNMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EDNMF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EHMEF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EDNMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • EHMEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EDNMF is a better buy in the short-term than EHMEF.

Price Growth

EDNMF (@Savings Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while EHMEF (@Savings Banks) price change was -0.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +3.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.90%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+3.54% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EDNMF($7.41B) has a higher market cap than EHMEF($2.44B). EDNMF (12.64) and EHMEF (12.24) have similar P/E ratio . EHMEF YTD gains are higher at: 28.237 vs. EDNMF (-16.220). EDNMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.17B vs. EHMEF (962M). EDNMF has more cash in the bank: 3.03B vs. EHMEF (196M). EHMEF has less debt than EDNMF: EHMEF (4.14B) vs EDNMF (4.54B). EDNMF has higher revenues than EHMEF: EDNMF (2.86B) vs EHMEF (1.6B).
EDNMFEHMEFEDNMF / EHMEF
Capitalization7.41B2.44B303%
EBITDA1.17B962M122%
Gain YTD-16.22028.237-57%
P/E Ratio12.6412.24103%
Revenue2.86B1.6B179%
Total Cash3.03B196M1,547%
Total Debt4.54B4.14B110%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EDNMF vs EHMEF: Fundamental Ratings
EDNMF
EHMEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4240
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10044
SMR RATING
1..100
8038
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7642
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9750
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EDNMF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EHMEF (59). This means that EDNMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EHMEF’s over the last 12 months.

EHMEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EDNMF (100). This means that EHMEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EDNMF’s over the last 12 months.

EHMEF's SMR Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EDNMF (80). This means that EHMEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EDNMF’s over the last 12 months.

EHMEF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EDNMF (76). This means that EHMEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EDNMF’s over the last 12 months.

EHMEF's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EDNMF (97). This means that EHMEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EDNMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EDNMFEHMEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EDNMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EHMEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SECIX47.38N/A
N/A
NAA Large Cap Value A
BRUHX16.75N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Value Equity I
FIVQX13.40N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor International Value I
PSIAX47.94N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Index A
JVLCX23.43N/A
N/A
JHancock Disciplined Value C

EDNMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EDNMF and CACC have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EDNMF and CACC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EDNMF
1D Price
Change %
EDNMF100%
N/A
CACC - EDNMF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
PRAA - EDNMF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
MIUFY - EDNMF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EHMEF - EDNMF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDNMY - EDNMF
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.90%
More

EHMEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EHMEF and WSC have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EHMEF and WSC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EHMEF
1D Price
Change %
EHMEF100%
N/A
WSC - EHMEF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
RM - EHMEF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
UHAL - EHMEF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
MIUFY - EHMEF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDNMF - EHMEF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More