EDSA
Price
$2.41
Change
-$0.04 (-1.63%)
Updated
Apr 3, 01:23 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
17.13M
SNBIF
Price
$6.55
Change
+$1.90 (+40.86%)
Updated
Feb 12 closing price
Capitalization
786.2M
Ad is loading...

EDSA vs SNBIF

Header iconEDSA vs SNBIF Comparison
Open Charts EDSA vs SNBIFBanner chart's image
Edesa Biotech
Price$2.41
Change-$0.04 (-1.63%)
Volume$600
Capitalization17.13M
Sanbio
Price$6.55
Change+$1.90 (+40.86%)
Volume$200
Capitalization786.2M
EDSA vs SNBIF Comparison Chart
Loading...
EDSA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EDSA vs. SNBIF commentary
Apr 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDSA is a Hold and SNBIF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 03, 2025
Stock price -- (EDSA: $2.45 vs. SNBIF: $6.55)
Brand notoriety: EDSA and SNBIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EDSA: 1% vs. SNBIF: 32%
Market capitalization -- EDSA: $17.13M vs. SNBIF: $786.2M
EDSA [@Biotechnology] is valued at $17.13M. SNBIF’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $786.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $308.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EDSA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSNBIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EDSA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SNBIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SNBIF is a better buy in the long-term than EDSA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EDSA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • EDSA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

EDSA (@Biotechnology) experienced а -3.45% price change this week, while SNBIF (@Biotechnology) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -8.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

EDSA is expected to report earnings on Dec 13, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (-8.22% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SNBIF($786M) has a higher market cap than EDSA($17.1M). EDSA YTD gains are higher at: 45.833 vs. SNBIF (40.860). EDSA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -5.99M vs. SNBIF (-1.57B). SNBIF has more cash in the bank: 3.96B vs. EDSA (1.56M). EDSA has less debt than SNBIF: EDSA (0) vs SNBIF (598M). EDSA (0) and SNBIF (0) have equivalent revenues.
EDSASNBIFEDSA / SNBIF
Capitalization17.1M786M2%
EBITDA-5.99M-1.57B0%
Gain YTD45.83340.860112%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.56M3.96B0%
Total Debt0598M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EDSA vs SNBIF: Fundamental Ratings
EDSA
SNBIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1941
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9998
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5637
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10062
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SNBIF's Valuation (95) in the null industry is in the same range as EDSA (100). This means that SNBIF’s stock grew similarly to EDSA’s over the last 12 months.

SNBIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as EDSA (100). This means that SNBIF’s stock grew similarly to EDSA’s over the last 12 months.

SNBIF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as EDSA (99). This means that SNBIF’s stock grew similarly to EDSA’s over the last 12 months.

SNBIF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as EDSA (56). This means that SNBIF’s stock grew similarly to EDSA’s over the last 12 months.

SNBIF's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EDSA (100). This means that SNBIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EDSA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EDSA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EDSA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYSGX47.86N/A
N/A
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth A
GOLDX26.72N/A
N/A
Gabelli Gold AAA
JIECX18.80N/A
N/A
JPMorgan International Equity C
MDILX19.30N/A
N/A
BlackRock International Inv A
LVAVX13.59N/A
N/A
LSV Conservative Value Equity Investor

EDSA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EDSA has been loosely correlated with DOMH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EDSA jumps, then DOMH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EDSA
1D Price
Change %
EDSA100%
+5.60%
DOMH - EDSA
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
MBRX - EDSA
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
ENTA - EDSA
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
SNPX - EDSA
33%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
ORMP - EDSA
32%
Poorly correlated
+3.29%
More

SNBIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNBIF has been loosely correlated with HRMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SNBIF jumps, then HRMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNBIF
1D Price
Change %
SNBIF100%
N/A
HRMY - SNBIF
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
QRON - SNBIF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CING - SNBIF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.12%
WXXWY - SNBIF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
EDSA - SNBIF
25%
Poorly correlated
+5.60%
More