EEFT
Price
$102.26
Change
+$3.17 (+3.20%)
Updated
Oct 24, 08:00 PM (EDT)
103 days until earnings call
QTWO
Price
$83.57
Change
+$0.56 (+0.67%)
Updated
Oct 24, 08:00 PM (EDT)
12 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EEFT vs QTWO

Header iconEEFT vs QTWO Comparison
Open Charts EEFT vs QTWOBanner chart's image
Euronet Worldwide
Price$102.26
Change+$3.17 (+3.20%)
Volume$630.3K
CapitalizationN/A
Q2 Holdings
Price$83.57
Change+$0.56 (+0.67%)
Volume$364.65K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
EEFT vs QTWO Comparison Chart
Loading...
EEFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
EEFT vs. QTWO commentary
Oct 25, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEFT is a Buy and QTWO is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 25, 2024
Stock price -- (EEFT: $102.26 vs. QTWO: $83.57)
Brand notoriety: EEFT and QTWO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EEFT: 214% vs. QTWO: 72%
Market capitalization -- EEFT: $4.97B vs. QTWO: $3.1B
EEFT [@Packaged Software] is valued at $4.97B. QTWO’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EEFT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQTWO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EEFT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EEFT is a better buy in the long-term than QTWO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EEFT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QTWO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EEFT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • QTWO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EEFT is a better buy in the short-term than QTWO.

Price Growth

EEFT (@Packaged Software) experienced а +3.22% price change this week, while QTWO (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

EEFT is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.14% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEFT($4.97B) has a higher market cap than QTWO($3.11B). QTWO YTD gains are higher at: 92.513 vs. EEFT (0.759). EEFT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 589M vs. QTWO (15.6M). EEFT has more cash in the bank: 1.78B vs. QTWO (324M). QTWO has less debt than EEFT: QTWO (549M) vs EEFT (2.01B). EEFT has higher revenues than QTWO: EEFT (3.69B) vs QTWO (625M).
EEFTQTWOEEFT / QTWO
Capitalization4.97B3.11B160%
EBITDA589M15.6M3,776%
Gain YTD0.75992.5131%
P/E Ratio19.75N/A-
Revenue3.69B625M590%
Total Cash1.78B324M549%
Total Debt2.01B549M367%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EEFT vs QTWO: Fundamental Ratings
EEFT
QTWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1213
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10087
SMR RATING
1..100
4394
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5637
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QTWO's Valuation (51) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as EEFT (64) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to EEFT’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as EEFT (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to EEFT’s over the last 12 months.

EEFT's SMR Rating (43) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (94) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that EEFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as EEFT (56) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to EEFT’s over the last 12 months.

EEFT's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that EEFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EEFTQTWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EEFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA260.4846.83
+21.92%
Tesla
BTC.X68161.0550001728.859400
+2.60%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME20.630.09
+0.44%
GameStop Corp
SPY579.241.25
+0.22%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL230.57-0.19
-0.08%
Apple

EEFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEFT has been loosely correlated with SSNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EEFT jumps, then SSNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EEFT
1D Price
Change %
EEFT100%
+3.20%
SSNC - EEFT
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
ALRM - EEFT
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
QTWO - EEFT
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
CLSK - EEFT
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.84%
ACIW - EEFT
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
More

QTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been loosely correlated with ALKT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then ALKT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTWO
1D Price
Change %
QTWO100%
+0.67%
ALKT - QTWO
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
ACIW - QTWO
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
COIN - QTWO
62%
Loosely correlated
+5.14%
SQ - QTWO
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.62%
ALRM - QTWO
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
More