EEM | EMSF | EEM / EMSF | |
Gain YTD | 21.804 | 14.238 | 153% |
Net Assets | 19.1B | 29.1M | 65,636% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.79 | 91% |
Turnover | 13.00 | 45.12 | 29% |
Yield | 2.37 | 2.93 | 81% |
Fund Existence | 22 years | 2 years | - |
EEM | EMSF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago80% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago66% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago89% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago81% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago83% | 25 days ago78% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago83% | 10 days ago87% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago81% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago87% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEM has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEM jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EEM | 100% | +1.20% | ||
BABA - EEM | 76% Closely correlated | +3.56% | ||
JD - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | +1.68% | ||
KC - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | +2.98% | ||
BILI - EEM | 69% Closely correlated | -0.40% | ||
BIDU - EEM | 67% Closely correlated | +3.82% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that EMSF and LEGN have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMSF and LEGN's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EMSF | 100% | +1.89% | ||
LEGN - EMSF | 0% Poorly correlated | +3.12% | ||
YMM - EMSF | -1% Poorly correlated | +1.15% | ||
ZH - EMSF | -2% Poorly correlated | +3.18% | ||
LRCX - EMSF | -3% Poorly correlated | +2.52% | ||
NU - EMSF | -4% Poorly correlated | -0.87% | ||
More |