Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEM vs QLVE
EEM vs QLVE Comparison
Open Charts EEM vs QLVE
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Price$50.45
Change+$0.60 (+1.20%)
Volume$24.81M
Net Assets18.97B
FlexShares EMs Quality Lw Vol ETF
Price$27.92
Change-$0.12 (-0.43%)
Volume$180
Net Assets14.03M
EEM vs QLVE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEM vs. QLVE commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEM is a Hold and QLVE is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEM has more net assets: 19B vs. QLVE (14M). EEM has a higher annual dividend yield than QLVE: EEM (21.804) vs QLVE (13.189). EEM was incepted earlier than QLVE: EEM (22 years) vs QLVE (6 years). QLVE (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than EEM (0.72). QLVE has a higher turnover EEM (13.00) vs EEM (13.00).
| EEM | QLVE | EEM / QLVE | |
| Gain YTD | 21.804 | 13.189 | 165% |
| Net Assets | 19B | 14M | 135,714% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.18 | 400% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 96.00 | 14% |
| Yield | 2.37 | 3.20 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEM | QLVE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 11 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEM has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEM jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEM | 100% | +1.20% | ||
| BABA - EEM | 76% Closely correlated | +3.56% | ||
| JD - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | +1.68% | ||
| KC - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | +2.98% | ||
| BILI - EEM | 69% Closely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| BIDU - EEM | 67% Closely correlated | +3.82% | ||
More | ||||
QLVE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QLVE and AP have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QLVE and AP's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLVE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLVE | 100% | N/A | ||
| AP - QLVE | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.79% | ||
| ZTO - QLVE | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.82% | ||
| JD - QLVE | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.68% | ||
| YUMC - QLVE | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.51% | ||
| AMR - QLVE | 2% Poorly correlated | +7.69% | ||
More | ||||